Search Results for "Continuous Occupation"

550 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 550 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Bus Driver Challenging Dismissal for Negligence in Fatal Accident. Held that the Labour Court and Industrial Court correctly upheld dismissal based on proved misconduct of gross negligence under Standing Order 20(j) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946.

The petitioner, Balu Namdevrao Mule, was employed as a bus driver with the BEST Undertaking since 1993. On 9 February 2003, while driving bus No. 6733...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Gratuity Dispute — Sets Aside Industrial Court Order Denying Gratuity. Employee's Continuous Service of 30 Years Entitles Him to Gratuity Under Section 4 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Despite Employer's Claim of Abandonment.

The Petitioner, Noor Mohammed Abdul Rehman Mulla, a retired employee, challenged the judgment and order dated 26 March 2021 passed by the Industrial C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Condonation of Service Gap in Retirement Benefits Case. Petitioner entitled to condonation of break in service under Rule 43 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 for computing qualifying service for pension.

The Petitioner, Dr Pradeep Rangrao Nalawade, was employed as an Assistant Professor at Poona College of Pharmacy (Respondent No.1), which is part of B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to MAT Order Directing Inclusion of Employee in Promotion Select List. Employee's Candidature for MFAS Examination Was Validly Accepted and He Passed, Therefore Result Cannot Be Withheld.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the judgment dated 08-10-2018 of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT), Nagpur Benc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of DV Act Proceedings Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Acts of Domestic Violence Allegedly Occurred in Germany, Not Within India, Hence Magistrate at Nagpur Had No Jurisdiction Under Section 27 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The applicant, Sumeet Ninave, challenged an order dated 21.10.2022 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur, rejecting his applicati...