Search Results for "processing costs"

905 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 905 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrowers' Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings by Cooperative Bank — Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act Held Efficacious. Petitioners Directed to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal for Relief Against Recovery Actions.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by borrowers (Arun Dattatraya Narake and others) against the Authorized Officer of Kolhapur Dist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes E-Auction Notice and Sale Certificate in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Violation of Rule 8(6) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. Failure to Serve 30-Day Notice Before Auction Renders Sale Void.

The petitioners, Sri T.S. Nataraj, Sri Harsha N., and Smt. N. Seema, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Iron Ore Sale Dispute. Petitioner granted injunction restraining respondent from drawing on bank guarantees and ordered to maintain status quo on letter of credit.

The petitioner, M/s. Vedanta Limited (formerly Sesa Sterlite Ltd), a company engaged in extraction, sale and export of iron ore, entered into a Master...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010159832015_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for LIC Policyholder Due to Deficiency of Service in Jeevan Aastha Plan. LIC's failure to process proposal and wrongful retention of premium for five years amounts to deficiency of service under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appellant, Madhav Hari Joshi, submitted a proposal to the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under its Jeevan Aastha Plan on 31 January 200...