ARBITRATION PETITION NO.549 OF 2013
9 Jun 2017...
Search Results for "exception period six years"
1604 result(s) found
Found 1604 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Interim Relief in Suit Challenging Show Cause Notices Issued Under 2024 RBI Master Directions Based on Forensic Audit by Allegedly Unqualified Auditor. Petitioner Contends that Audit Firm Not Chartered Accountant and Report Invalid Under Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and RBI Directions.
24 Dec 2025This matter concerned three suits filed by the plaintiff, Anil D. Ambani, against Indian Overseas Bank, IDBI Bank, Bank of Baroda, and others, along w...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Criminal Appeal Challenging Conviction for Murder and Disappearance of Evidence; Accused Contends that Disclosure Statement Led Recovery is Inadmissible Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act and that Conviction Should be Reduced to Section 304 Part II IPC Due to Sudden Quarrel.
23 Oct 2020The appeal arose from a judgment of conviction dated 16.11.2015 in SC No.31/2014 by the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Shivamogga sitting a...
- 23
High Court
Full Bench of Bombay High Court Answers Reference on the Interpretation of Secondary Schools Code in School Record Correction Cases. The court resolves conflicts between earlier Division Bench judgments on whether an ex-student can seek alteration of name, date of birth, and caste in school leaving certificates under Clauses 26.3 and 26.4 of the Code.
17 Oct 2019The writ petition came before the Full Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, on a reference made by a Division Bench v...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of Regularisation Notifications for Contractual Employees in Haryana. The Court held that Notifications issued by the State of Haryana in 2014 for regularising contractual, ad hoc, and daily wage employees were invalid as they violated Supreme Court precedents and constitutional principles under Articles 14, 16, and 162 of the Constitution of India.
16 Apr 2026The dispute arose from the State of Haryana's issuance of Notifications in 2014 aimed at regularising the services of contractual, ad hoc, and daily w...
- 838
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Group of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Slum Land Acquisition Provisions. The Petitioners, Owners of Lands Declared as Slum Areas, Challenge the Acquisition Notices Issued Under Section 14 and the Method of Compensation Under Section 17 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.
10 May 2013In Mumbai, where more than half the population lives in slums, the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 was ena...
- 21
High Court
Karnataka High Court Examines Interpretation of Provisos to Section 10A(2)(b) of MMDR Act in Writ Petitions. Prospecting Licence Holders Seek Mandamus for Execution of Mining Leases Pending Environmental Clearance.
27 May 2022The High Court of Karnataka heard a group of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by companies engaged in mining, seeking v...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision and Restores Rejection of Plaint in Suit Based on Unregistered Agreement. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Fails as Agreement Not Produced and Suit Time-Barred Under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963.
17 Feb 2024The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Ajmera Enterprises (the applicant) against an order of the appellate court which had set aside...
- 67
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Unexplained Delay and Unworkability - Restores Parties to Original Positions Under Article 142. Unexplained delay of over three years in pronouncing award and failure to finally settle disputes renders award contrary to public policy under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 Jan 2025The Supreme Court of India considered two civil appeals arising from an arbitral award that was reserved on 28.07.2012 but pronounced only on 16.03.20...
- 95
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
1 Jan 2020The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...
- 388
