Search Results for "commercial arbitration petition"

1252 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1252 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Arbitrator in Commercial Lease Dispute — Failure to Nominate Arbitrator Despite Arbitration Clause. Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where a party fails to appoint an arbitrator, the court may appoint one.

The petitioner, Satyam Cineplexes Limited, a company engaged in managing multiplex cinema halls, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Over Excess Payments and Blacklisting — Limitation Period Not Barred as Dispute Continued and Final Bill Not Rejected.

The case involves a dispute between Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board (the Board) and Saryu Plastics Pvt. Ltd. (the Company) regarding supply co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Remove Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute. Relationship Between Arbitrator and Law Firm Representing Party Does Not Automatically Disqualify Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act.

The petitioner, Sheetal Maruti Kurundwade, filed a petition under Section 9 and Sections 12(3) and 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition to Quash FIR Against Intermediary in Alleged Fraud. Petitioner Alleged to be Mere Intermediary Between Complainant Company and UK-Based Supplier in International Sales Contract.

The petitioner, Govindaraja, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Crimin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Plaintiff to Adduce Evidence in Commercial Suit, Finding No Perversity or Jurisdictional Error. Order Passed Under Order 18 Rule 4(1B) CPC Not Violative of Embargo When Sufficient Cause Shown.

The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit (Commercial O.S. No. 1/2018) filed by a Class-I contractor before the Commercial Court at Raichur aga...