Search Results for "co-operative society resolution"

779 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 779 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Hears Letters Patent Appeals Against Writ Petition Order in Co-operative Sugar Factory Dispute — Appeals involve allegations of mismanagement, enquiry under Section 83 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and liquidation proceedings.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard two Letters Patent Appeals (No. 197 of 2009 and No. 239 of 2009) arising from Writ Petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 17993 OF 2023

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Sets Aside Decree for Non-Compliance with Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Pay Balance Consideration, Rendering Specific Performance Unwarranted.

The case involves a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the original defendant No. 2 (appellant) challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition No.4228 of 2025. The petition is filed by 28 individuals, likely agriculturists, but the specific relief sought and the underlying dispute are not detailed in the provided excerpt.

The matter is a writ petition filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioners, numbering 28, are individuals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Bird Feeding from Balcony in Nuisance Dispute. Feeding birds from a metal tray attached to balcony window causing accumulation of bird droppings and feathers held to constitute nuisance, and injunction granted under Section 38 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves an appeal against an order granting a temporary injunction restraining the appellants (original defendant nos. 1 and 2) from feeding...