Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition No.4228 of 2025. The petition is filed by 28 individuals, likely agriculturists, but the specific relief sought and the underlying dispute are not detailed in the provided excerpt.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 44
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter is a writ petition filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioners, numbering 28, are individuals engaged in agriculture. The specific nature of the dispute, the relief sought, and the grounds are not discernible from the provided extract. The judgment excerpt includes the listing of petitioners and the case number, but lacks factual background, legal issues, arguments, and the court's decision.

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.4228 OF 2025

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 160

WRIT PETITION NO.4228 OF 2025

2025-04-10

2025:BHC-AS:16719-DB

Ramchandra Jakappa Nandavadekar, Allabaksh Fakaru Sayyad, Hanmant Vishnu Gurav, Keshav Dulbaji Ilage, Arjun Nana Naik, Balu Vithoba Patil, Vitthal Dhondiba Nevage, Bharamu Rajaba Ilage, Tukaram Sataba Patil, Vithoba Satu Sawant, Shrikant Balaku Nevage, Parashram Ramchandra Ilage, Balaku Ravaji Ilage, Isak Saifo Mulla, Maruti Gundu Mudale, Prabhakar Dulabaji Ilage, Namita Bharamu Patil, Gundu Dhondiba Nandavadekar, Tanaji Sakharam Ilage, Arjun Janaba Ilage, Rukamana Krishna Niturkar, Laxman Ramchandra Dhanavade, Bharamu Maruti Gavade, Shivaji Laxman Ilage, Bashir Umar Sayyad, Gous Nanhu Sayyad, Ramji Motiram Giri

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Multinational Company in Rent Control Case. Section 3(1)(b) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 exempts premises let to multinational companies from protection of the Act, and concurrent findings of fact are no...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Civil Suit Against Wind Power Project for Lack of Jurisdiction — Suit Barred Under Section 9 CPC Due to Special Tribunal's Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Electricity Act, 2003.