Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition No.4228 of 2025. The petition is filed by 28 individuals, likely agriculturists, but the specific relief sought and the underlying dispute are not detailed in the provided excerpt.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 41
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter is a writ petition filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioners, numbering 28, are individuals engaged in agriculture. The specific nature of the dispute, the relief sought, and the grounds are not discernible from the provided extract. The judgment excerpt includes the listing of petitioners and the case number, but lacks factual background, legal issues, arguments, and the court's decision.

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.4228 OF 2025

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 160

WRIT PETITION NO.4228 OF 2025

2025-04-10

2025:BHC-AS:16719-DB

Ramchandra Jakappa Nandavadekar, Allabaksh Fakaru Sayyad, Hanmant Vishnu Gurav, Keshav Dulbaji Ilage, Arjun Nana Naik, Balu Vithoba Patil, Vitthal Dhondiba Nevage, Bharamu Rajaba Ilage, Tukaram Sataba Patil, Vithoba Satu Sawant, Shrikant Balaku Nevage, Parashram Ramchandra Ilage, Balaku Ravaji Ilage, Isak Saifo Mulla, Maruti Gundu Mudale, Prabhakar Dulabaji Ilage, Namita Bharamu Patil, Gundu Dhondiba Nandavadekar, Tanaji Sakharam Ilage, Arjun Janaba Ilage, Rukamana Krishna Niturkar, Laxman Ramchandra Dhanavade, Bharamu Maruti Gavade, Shivaji Laxman Ilage, Bashir Umar Sayyad, Gous Nanhu Sayyad, Ramji Motiram Giri

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Interprets Recruitment Rules on Preliminary Examination Cut-off and OBC Reservation. Rule 13 of Rajasthan State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1962 Does Not Prescribe Minimum Cut-off Marks and Requires 15 Times Vacancies to be Called f...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Tariff Classification Dispute Over Mixed-Fibre Fabric. Fabric Containing 35% Cotton, 33% Polyester, and 32% Viscose Not Classifiable as Cotton Fabric Under Item 19 of Central Excise Tariff Beca...