Search Results for "Vague Averments"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Vague Averments"

840 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 840 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Cooperative Society Recovery Proceedings — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to Challenge Ex Parte Award. Delay of 1 Year 7 Months Condoned as Petitioner Was Not Served with Notice and Had No Knowledge of Proceedings Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

21 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Kailas Dinkar Wani, took a loan of Rs. 1,50,000 from respondent no. 1, Shri Agrasen Urban Cooperative Credit Society Ltd., on 3 Decemb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Cooperative Society Recovery Proceedings — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to Contest Recovery Certificate. Delay of 15 months condoned as sufficient cause shown under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963, read with Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

21 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Dinkar Vishwanath Wani, had taken a loan of Rs. 1,50,000 from respondent no. 1, Shri Agrasen Urban Cooperative Credit Society Ltd., on...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Documents. Father of detenu successfully challenged preventive detention order passed under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974 on grounds of non-application of mind by detaining authority and failure to supply vital documents.

4 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Shri Rashid Kapadia, father of the detenu Khalil Ahmed Rashid Ahmed Kapadia, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constituti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of APMC Chairman Challenging Removal — Show-Cause Notice Under Section 45 of Maharashtra APMC Act Must Specify Charges. Removal Order Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice as Notice Was Vague and No Proper Hearing Was Given.

23 Apr 2012

The petitioner, Sopanrao Onkarrao Sathe, was a member and Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Malkapur. He was served with a show-c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Transfer Orders of Bank Employees — Transfer Policy Not Violative of Service Conditions. Employer's Right to Transfer Upheld as Incident of Service.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees of the Chandrapur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. challenging their transfer ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court held that the second appellate court cannot reappreciate evidence and interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless perverse or based on no evidence.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court which reversed the tri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Ration Card Fraud Case Due to Civil Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. The court held that the dispute over a ration card was civil in nature and did not constitute offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC as the card was issued by the Tahsildar after due process.

5 Sep 2019

The applicant, Satyanarayan Lohiya, a senior citizen, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Procedural Irregularities in Notice Period and Meeting Conduct Render Motion Invalid. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 was not complied with, and the meeting was not conducted properly, thus quashing the no-confidence motion.

8 Nov 2019

The petitioners, Indraraj Babulal Jaiswal and Sangitabai Laxman Shinde, were the Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch respectively of Grampanchayat Tembhurni....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Referral of Admiralty Suit to Arbitration Under Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Arbitration Agreement Enforceable Despite Admiralty Claim. The court held that the existence of an arbitration agreement between parties mandates referral of the dispute to arbitration, and the admiralty suit cannot proceed in court.

6 Jul 2005

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking referral of an admiralty...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute, Directs Security for Full Claim Amount Under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC. The court held that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for attachment before judgment for the entire claim, as the defendant had refused to accept goods and was attempting to alienate property.

17 Apr 2013

The appellant, Herald Engineers, filed a suit against Wonderpack Industries Pvt Ltd and another respondent for recovery of Rs.40,36,567/-. The suit wa...

42 43 44 45 46

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)