Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Transfer Orders of Bank Employees — Transfer Policy Not Violative of Service Conditions. Employer's Right to Transfer Upheld as Incident of Service.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 22
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees of the Chandrapur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. challenging their transfer orders. The petitioners, including Ramesh Raghobaji Kirtane, Narendra Sadashiv Jorigewar, and Ku. Chhaya Balwantrao Hamdapure, were transferred from one branch to another within the bank. They contended that the transfers were illegal, mala fide, and violative of their service conditions. The bank and other respondents argued that transfer is an incident of service and the employer has the right to transfer employees as per the transfer policy. The court analyzed the service conditions and the transfer policy of the bank. It held that transfer is a normal incident of service and the employer has the discretion to transfer employees unless the transfer is shown to be mala fide or contrary to the service rules. The petitioners failed to provide any evidence of mala fides or violation of service conditions. Consequently, the court dismissed all the writ petitions, upholding the transfer orders.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer - Employer's Right - Transfer Policy - The court considered whether transfer orders issued by a co-operative bank to its employees were illegal. Held that transfer is an incident of service and the employer has the right to transfer employees unless the transfer is mala fide or contrary to service rules. The petitioners failed to establish any mala fides or violation of service conditions. (Paras 1-10)

B) Co-operative Bank - Transfer - Service Conditions - The court examined the service conditions of the petitioners and found that the transfer policy of the bank permitted transfers. The petitioners did not demonstrate any specific bar in the service rules against transfer. Held that the transfers were valid and within the employer's authority. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer orders issued by the Chandrapur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. transferring the petitioners from one branch to another are illegal and violative of their service conditions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

All writ petitions are dismissed. The transfer orders are upheld.

Law Points

  • Transfer policy
  • Service conditions
  • Co-operative bank
  • Writ jurisdiction
  • Employer's right to transfer
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (05) 58

Writ Petition No.4666/2011, Writ Petition No.4667/2011, Writ Petition No.1919/2011, Writ Petition No.1920/2011, Writ Petition No.1921/2011, Writ Petition No.1922/2011, and Writ Petition No.4582/2011

0000-00-00

Shri B.M. Khan for petitioners, Shri P.C. Madkholkar for respondent No.1, Ms P.D. Rane for respondent Nos.2 to 5

Ramesh Raghobaji Kirtane, Narendra Sadashiv Jorigewar, Ku. Chhaya Balwantrao Hamdapure, and others

The Chandrapur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging transfer orders issued by a co-operative bank to its employees.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought quashing of transfer orders transferring them from one branch to another.

Filing Reason

The petitioners alleged that the transfer orders were illegal, mala fide, and violative of their service conditions.

Issues

Whether the transfer orders are illegal and violative of service conditions. Whether the employer has the right to transfer employees under the transfer policy.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that transfers were mala fide and contrary to service conditions. Respondents argued that transfer is an incident of service and the employer has the right to transfer.

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer is an incident of service and the employer has the right to transfer employees unless the transfer is mala fide or contrary to service rules. The petitioners failed to establish any mala fides or violation of service conditions.

Judgment Excerpts

Transfer is an incident of service and the employer has the right to transfer employees unless the transfer is mala fide or contrary to service rules.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions in the High Court challenging transfer orders issued by the bank. The court heard arguments and dismissed the petitions.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Uxoricide Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Transfer Orders of Bank Employees — Transfer Policy Not Violative of Service Conditions. Employer's Right to Transfer Upheld as Incident of Service.