W.P.NOS.16428 OF 2025, 25868 OF 2024, 25869 OF 2024,
9 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Time Bound Promotion Scheme"
538 result(s) found
Found 538 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Against Housing Society and Flat Owners for Lack of Arbitrable Dispute. Dispute over alleged oral agreement for redevelopment of building not covered by arbitration clause in share certificate.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, M/s Heritage Lifestyle & Developers Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...
- 106
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Rajasthan High Court's Decision to Fix Minimum Cut-Off Marks After Examination in Translator Recruitment. Fixing 75% Cut-Off After Examination Held Impermissible as It Alters Selection Procedure Mid-Process Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
7 Nov 2024The case arose from a recruitment process initiated by the Rajasthan High Court in 2009 for 13 posts of Translators. The applicable rules, as amended ...
- 1279
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds UGC Regulations on Deemed Universities — Regulations Held Valid and Not Ultra Vires. The court dismissed petitions challenging the UGC (Institutions Deemed to be Universities) Regulations 2010, finding them within the rule-making power under Section 26 of the UGC Act, 1956 and not violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution.
22 May 2014The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by deemed universities, including Manipal University and Sri Siddartha Academy of Higher Education...
- 91
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards of Reinstatement Without Back Wages. Held that daily wage employees who worked for less than 240 days in a year are not entitled to reinstatement under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
23 Dec 2022The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the employer, Dainik Bhaskar Group (D. B. Corp Ltd), challenging the awards of the Labour Cou...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Whether GlaxoSmithKline Decision on Territorial Jurisdiction Stands Overruled by Supreme Court. Issue Pertains to Determination of Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour/Industrial Courts Under MRTU Act When Employees Are Posted Outside Maharashtra But Employer's Office Is Within State.
3 Nov 2025The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of matters comprising Appeal No. 585 of 2009 and several connected writ petitions. The core dispute centered on...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Division Bench Examines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts under MRTU Act Amidst Conflict with Supreme Court Precedents. The Court Considers Whether the Decision in GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Abhay Raj Jain Stands Impliedly Overruled by Nandram v. Garware Polyester Limited and Rakesh Kumar Verma v. HDFC Bank Ltd. for Determining Cause of Action in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints.
3 Nov 2025This judgment deals with a batch of appeals and writ petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay involving a common question of territoria...
- 24
High Court
High Court of Bombay Determines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts Under MRTU Act for Employees Outside Maharashtra. The Court considers whether the principle that situs of employee determines jurisdiction (GlaxoSmithKline) is overruled by subsequent Supreme Court rulings.
3 Nov 2025The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of matters, including Appeal No.585 of 2009 and several writ petitions, involving employees and trade unions fr...
- 24
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Issues Rule in PIL Challenging Encroachment and Regularisation of Comunidade Lands; Petitioners Allege Violation of Code of Comunidades and Favouritism to Minister.
6 May 2016Two Public Interest Litigation writ petitions (PIL WP No. 15 of 2014 and PIL WP No. 16 of 2014) were filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa chal...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Bar Council Rule Limiting Regular Approval of Law Colleges to Five Years. Rule 2(xxiv) of the Rules of Legal Education 2008 Held Intra Vires the Advocates Act, 1961; Permanent Approval Status Not Recognized Under New Rules.
8 Apr 2020The petitioners, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University and its Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar College of Law, challenged the validity of Rule 2(xxiv) ...
- 130
