Search Results for "Sticks"

611 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 611 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Unreliable Child Witness and Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sheikh Rashid, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Session Trial No. 67/98 for offences under Sections 302 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in NDPS Act Case for Smuggling Heroin in Suitcases. Circumstantial Evidence Including Possession of Keys, Baggage Tags, and Concealment of Contraband Sufficient to Prove Conscious Possession Under Section 21(c) of NDPS Act, 1985.

The appellant, Mrs. Agnes Ruddy Odhoch, a Kenyan national, was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Mumbai, for offences under Sections 21(c), 23(c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Intent to Kill and Witness Testimony Contained Material Contradictions.

The appellants, Kisan, Shalikram, Ramesh, and Ananta, were convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, for offences under Sections 307, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as evidence of interested witnesses and identification parade was flawed.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the Sessions Court convicting multiple accused for murder under Section 302 read wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement in Favor of Plaintiff. Passing Off Claim Deferred Due to Pending Rectification Proceedings Under Section 124 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiffs, Hem Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and three individuals (erstwhile partners of a firm), filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of APMC Chairman Challenging Removal — Show-Cause Notice Under Section 45 of Maharashtra APMC Act Must Specify Charges. Removal Order Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice as Notice Was Vague and No Proper Hearing Was Given.

The petitioner, Sopanrao Onkarrao Sathe, was a member and Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Malkapur. He was served with a show-c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close friend of deceased and his testimony was not corroborated by other evidence.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of three appellants for the murder of Mayur Damle under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and for assaul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder Conviction Under Section 302 IPC — Evidence of Witnesses and Medical Reports Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Proved Case Based on Testimony of Eyewitnesses and Recovery of Weapons.

The appellant, Kailash s/o Jagdeo Gade, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon in Sessions Trial No.25 of 2007 for the offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative and her testimony was inconsistent with medical evidence.

The appellants, original accused Nos. 5, 6, and 8, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga, for the murder of one person under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Murder and Destruction of Evidence in Brutal Killing of Mentally Challenged Victim. Life Imprisonment and Fine Affirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including DNA, Recovery of Weapon, and Motive of Insurance Fraud.

The appellant, Janardhan Kokre, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, South Goa, for the murder of Dilip Sadashiv Naik, a mentally challenged person, u...