Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

525 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 525 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee in Social Forestry Department — Transfer Not Accepted as Termination Under MRTU & PULP Act. Labour Court's finding of unfair labour practice upheld as employer failed to prove abandonment of service.

The case involves a writ petition filed by officers of the Social Forestry Department of the State Government challenging the judgments of the Labour ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order for Engagement of Daily Wagers. Court upholds direction to engage complainants as per seniority and Kalelkar Settlement Award, finding no perversity in Industrial Court's findings.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Pune, filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Interim Injunction in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Industrial Court's Order Restraining Sale of Assets Upheld as Within Jurisdiction Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, Esselworld Leisure Pvt. Ltd. (a private limited company operating a ride and amusement park, water kingdom, and bird park) along with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Appeal Under Payment of Gratuity Act Due to Limitation. Appellate Authority Under Section 7(7) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Has No Power to Condone Delay Beyond 60 Days.

The petitioner, Nanded Zilla Dekhrekh Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, challenged the order of the Industrial Court (appellate authority) dated 28.11.2016, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Transfer as Unfair Labour Practice. Transfer of Employee After 28 Years of Service to Chennai Held Malafide and Without Justification Under Items 3 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Sulzer Pumps India Private Limited, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Thane, which declared that the employer had engag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Issues Rule in Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation's Absorption of Builder's Employees. The Court entertained the challenge under Article 226 to Resolution No. 25 and order dated 27.06.2007 absorbing 69 persons, directing final hearing forthwith.

The petitioners, 69 unemployed youths from Thane district, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the High Court of Judica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Award on Wage Revision and Education Allowance. Industrial Court's power to grant ad-hoc wage rise upheld, but education allowance award set aside for lack of evidence.

The petitioner, Ganesh Industries, an employer engaged in trading of Papad, challenged an Award dated 11 June 2019 passed by the Industrial Court, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Challenging Unfair Labour Practices Order. Settlement Clause Denying Benefits to Later-Recruited Workmen Held Invalid Under Proviso to Section 18(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The matter arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by Ceat Ltd. challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, d...