Search Results for "Investment Ratio"

577 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 577 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows KSRTC Appeal in Property Tax Reassessment Case — Reassessment Notice After 14 Years Held Time-Barred. Commissioner's Power to Reopen Assessment Under Section 112-A(4) of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 Must Be Exercised Within a Reasonable Period of 3 Years.

The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) appealed against a Single Judge order that upheld the Commissioner's power to reopen property t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 17-B Application for Six Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Employer Must Pay Full Wages Pending Writ. Workmen's Affidavits of Unemployment Sufficient; No Need to Plead Not Gainfully Employed in Original Affidavit.

The case involves a Civil Application under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, filed by Kirloskar Pneumatic Kamgar Sangh (the Union) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ICAR and NRCC, Upholds State Government as Appropriate Government for Labour Dispute. Jurisdiction of Labour Court under MRTU & PULP Act Confirmed for Termination of Agricultural Labourers Employed by Central Government Undertaking.

The case involves an appeal by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and the National Research Centre for Citrus (NRCC) against a judgmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Modifies Apportionment of Compensation Between Widow, Children, and Parents. Widow and Minor Children Held Entitled to Larger Share Than Aged Parents Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the widow, minor children, and aged parents of the deceased Dinesh Waman Patil. The Motor Acciden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act for Want of Prosecution — Technical Dismissal Not on Merits. The court held that dismissal under Section 256 CrPC is not a bar to appeal as it is not a decision on merits.

The applicant, Terna Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a cooperative sugar factory registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against CIDCO's Revocation of Change of User Permission — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Applied Against Public Authority. CIDCO Cannot Revoke Permission After Allottee Acts Upon It to Its Detriment.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Ambica Developers, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Madeva Patel, was allotted Plot No. 1 in Sector 1, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Hotel Management Contract Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 as Findings Are Plausible. Arbitrator's Finding of Breach of Contract and Award of Damages Upheld as Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy.

The petitioner, Hotel Corporation of India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conc...