Search Results for "ordinance amendment"

510 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 510 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows CBI Appeals in PC Act Cases: Consent Under Section 6 DSPE Act Not Required for Investigation of Central Government Employees; Notification Under Section 3 PC Act Not a Condition Precedent for Trial by Special Judge.

The Supreme Court of India heard two appeals filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against a common judgment of the High Court of Andhra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Upholds High Court Decision Based on Binding Precedent. Section 4 Notification Declared Null and Void for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Publication Requirements Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, which had quashed the acquisition of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Return of Plaint in Commercial Dispute Case — Immovable Property Not Used Exclusively in Trade or Commerce. Agreement to Sell and Mortgage Deed Registration Dispute Falls Outside Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Land Was Not Pled to Be Used for Trade or Commerce.

The appellant, Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd., filed a Commercial Civil Suit No. 41/2018 before the Commercial Court at Vadodara seeking enforcemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Section 6 Notification Quashed for Violation of Section 5A Hearing. Court Holds That Fresh Declaration Under Section 6 Can Be Issued Beyond One Year If Original Notification Was Quashed Due to Procedural Defect.

The applicant, Narendra Tarachand Agrawal, filed a review application against the judgment of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 2017/2001, de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Delay in Section 6 Declaration. Section 6 Declaration Issued Beyond One Year from Last Publication of Section 4 Notification Invalidates Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, Riva Resorts Pvt. Ltd. and its director Vishwanath Balaram Naik Palyekar, challenged the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Irrigation Project Due to Delay in Section 6 Declaration. Declaration Issued Beyond One-Year Statutory Period Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Rendering Acquisition Proceedings Null and Void.

The petitioners, Baban Homaji Phadtare and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the notification d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 6608 OF 2016

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Transfer of Winding Up Petitions to NCLT Under Section 434(1) of Companies Act, 2013 — Mandatory Transfer of Pending Proceedings Where No Winding Up Order Has Been Passed.

The judgment concerns two company applications filed by M/s. Nitesh Residency Hotels Pvt. Ltd. seeking transfer of pending winding up petitions (Compa...