Search Results for "notice under CPC"

3583 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3583 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Jurisdictional Challenge in Admiralty Suit Filed Without Vessel in Territorial Waters. Suit Held Maintainable When Arrest Warrant Executed upon Vessel's Subsequent Arrival, Following Geetanjali Woolen Precedent.

The case involves an admiralty suit in rem filed by Great Pacific Navigation (Holdings) Corporation Limited, a Hong Kong company, against the vessel M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Mesne Profits Award in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Rate Fixed at Rs.1,24,099 per Month Based on Expert Evidence. Court Confirms That Mesne Profits Are Determined by Market Rent, Not Controlled Rent, and Interest at 6% p.a. Is Appropriate.

The case involves a dispute between Bata India Limited (the applicant/tenant) and Bindiya Co-operative Housing Society Limited (the respondent/landlor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeals by Transport Authorities Against State Tourism Corporation's Tax Exemption Claim. Tourist Vehicles of Andhra Pradesh State Tourism Corporation Not Exempt from Tax Under Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 Despite Notification Dated 22.03.1994.

The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by the Assistant Regional Transport Officer and the Deputy Commissioner for Transports against an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record in Limitation Finding. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC and Order 47 Rule 1 is limited to errors apparent on record, not re-appreciation of evidence.

The review petition was filed by Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (the original respondent no.1 in Arbitration Appeal No. 6 of 2007) seeking review of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Dealer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Dealer Not Liable as Owner Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Dealership Agreement Cannot Shift Statutory Liability of Manufacturer for Third-Party Compensation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Vaibhav Jain, the proprietor of M/s Vaibhav Motors, a dealer of Hindustan Motors Pvt. Ltd. The case aros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Adjudicated a Commercial Suit for Recovery of Chit Maturity Amount Against a Partnership Firm and Partners. The plaintiff claimed the maturity value based on an acknowledgment of liability and promissory estoppel, while the defendants raised a prior suit for injunction and accounts.

The plaintiff, a construction company, filed a commercial suit against a partnership firm (first defendant) and its partners (defendants 2 to 6) for r...