Search Results for "exhaustive provisions"

1736 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1736 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Rape and Murder of Four-Year-Old Girl. Conviction under Sections 302, 376(2)(i), 377, 363, 366, 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code Upheld for Acts Committed in Furtherance of Common Intention.

The case arises from a reference under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for confirmation of the death sentence and an appeal agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Extradition Order in Matrimonial Dispute, Dissolves Marriage on Ground of Irretrievable Breakdown Under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. Court Quashes Multiple Criminal Proceedings Filed by Wife Against Husband and In-Laws as Abuse of Process of Law.

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which had affirmed a trial court order directing extradition of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal, Sets Aside Arbitrator Appointment in Insurance Claim Dispute. Full and Final Settlement Discharge Voucher Signed Without Demur Bars Arbitration Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by United India Insurance Co. Ltd. against a Delhi High Court order appointing an arbitrator under Section 11...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against MSEDCL for Refund of Infrastructure Costs Under DDF Category. Consumer Definition Under Electricity Act, 2003 Includes Persons Supplied Electricity for Layout Development.

The petitioner, Smt. Savita Chandrashekhar Thodage, applied to the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) for a new electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Amendment Application in Civil Suit — Amendment Sought After 11 Years and After Commencement of Trial Held Not Bonafide and Would Cause Prejudice to Opposite Party.

The petitioners, who were defendants in Special Civil Suit No.123 of 1990 filed by the predecessor of respondents No.1 to 8, challenged the order date...