Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Extradition Order in Matrimonial Dispute, Dissolves Marriage on Ground of Irretrievable Breakdown Under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. Court Quashes Multiple Criminal Proceedings Filed by Wife Against Husband and In-Laws as Abuse of Process of Law.

In Favour of Accused
  • 759
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which had affirmed a trial court order directing extradition of the appellant. The appellant, a software engineer residing in the USA, married the respondent in February 2018. The couple lived together only for about 80 days in the USA, during which the appellant alleged domestic abuse by the respondent, leading to criminal charges against her in the USA. After returning to India, the respondent refused to accompany the appellant back to the USA and initiated multiple legal proceedings against the appellant and his family members in various courts in Bihar and West Bengal, including cases under the Indian Penal Code, Dowry Prohibition Act, and Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The appellant's passport was impounded in 2018. In 2022, the respondent filed an application under the Domestic Violence Act, and the trial court directed the appellant to appear personally. When he failed to appear, the court ordered extradition proceedings. The High Court dismissed the appellant's revision. During the appeal, the appellant filed an application under Article 142 seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown. The Supreme Court noted that the marriage had broken down irretrievably, with no cohabitation since May 2018 and multiple litigations indicating a complete rift. The Court observed that the respondent had filed numerous cases with identical allegations, amounting to abuse of process of law. The Court exercised its power under Article 142 to dissolve the marriage, quashed all criminal proceedings initiated by the respondent against the appellant and his family members, and set aside the extradition order. The Court directed the appellant to pay permanent alimony of Rs. 25 lakhs to the respondent within eight weeks.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage - Article 142 of the Constitution of India - Dissolution of Marriage - The marriage between the parties lasted only 80 days and there has been no cohabitation since May 2018; multiple litigations indicate complete breakdown - Supreme Court exercised its plenary power under Article 142 to dissolve the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown, as all attempts at reconciliation failed and the marriage was dead emotionally and practically (Paras 9, 12-14).

B) Criminal Procedure - Abuse of Process of Law - Multiple Proceedings - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 498A, 307, 506, 406, 323, 324, 405, 420, 379, 499, 500, 341, 342, 403, 504, 120B; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Sections 3 & 4; Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Sections 12, 18-22, 26, 31, 32 - The respondent filed numerous cases in different jurisdictions with identical allegations against the appellant and his family members, reflecting a vindictive attitude and gross abuse of the legal process - The Supreme Court quashed all proceedings initiated by the respondent against the appellant and his relatives to prevent further harassment (Paras 5, 10-11, 14).

C) Extradition - Order for Extradition - The trial court directed extradition of the appellant for failure to appear in a domestic violence case - The Supreme Court set aside the extradition order as the underlying proceedings were quashed and the appellant had not been evading process but was residing abroad (Paras 2, 7-8, 14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court erred in affirming the trial court's order directing extradition of the appellant; whether the marriage between the parties has irretrievably broken down warranting dissolution under Article 142 of the Constitution; whether multiple criminal proceedings filed by the respondent constitute abuse of process of law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court and the trial court's order directing extradition. The Court dissolved the marriage between the parties under Article 142 of the Constitution on the ground of irretrievable breakdown. All criminal proceedings initiated by the respondent against the appellant and his family members were quashed. The appellant was directed to pay permanent alimony of Rs. 25 lakhs to the respondent within eight weeks.

Law Points

  • Irretrievable breakdown of marriage
  • Abuse of process of law
  • Extradition
  • Article 142 of the Constitution of India
  • Domestic Violence Act
  • 2005
  • Indian Penal Code
  • 1860
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (SC) (2) 206

[Criminal Appeal No(s).________ of 2025 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No(s). 4297 of 2023]

2025-02-20

Mehta, J.

Vishal Shah

Monalisha Gupta & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against order directing extradition in matrimonial dispute, with application for dissolution of marriage under Article 142.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought quashing of extradition order and dissolution of marriage on ground of irretrievable breakdown.

Filing Reason

Appellant aggrieved by High Court order affirming trial court's direction to initiate extradition process against him for non-appearance in domestic violence case.

Previous Decisions

Trial court (Judicial Magistrate, Howrah) on 15th September 2022 directed extradition process; High Court of Calcutta on 25th January 2023 dismissed Criminal Revision No. 135 of 2023.

Issues

Whether the marriage between the parties has irretrievably broken down warranting dissolution under Article 142 of the Constitution. Whether the multiple criminal proceedings filed by the respondent constitute abuse of process of law. Whether the order directing extradition of the appellant is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the marriage lasted only 80 days, no cohabitation since May 2018, and respondent filed numerous cases with identical allegations amounting to vendetta and abuse of process. Appellant submitted that his mother was thrown out of the house by respondent, and despite offers of settlement and mediation, respondent refused to settle. Appellant prayed for dissolution of marriage under Article 142 and quashing of all proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The marriage between the parties had irretrievably broken down with no possibility of reconciliation, as evidenced by the short cohabitation of 80 days, complete estrangement since May 2018, and multiple litigations. The Supreme Court, in exercise of its plenary power under Article 142 of the Constitution, can dissolve a marriage on this ground to do complete justice. The multiple criminal proceedings filed by the respondent with identical allegations in different jurisdictions constituted an abuse of the process of law, warranting quashing. The extradition order was set aside as the underlying proceedings were quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The marriage between the appellant and respondent was solemnized on 19th February, 2018, as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. The appellant alleges that, while residing in the USA, he was subjected to continuous domestic abuse at the hands of the respondent-wife. The respondent initiated multiple legal proceedings against the appellant and his family members in various courts/fora across the country. Learned senior counsel representing the appellant, urged that the appellant and the respondent cohabited together only for a short duration of 80 days after their marriage. He prayed that while quashing the proceedings of the various cases filed by the respondent against the appellant and his family members, a direction deserves to be issued dissolving the marriage.

Procedural History

The trial court (Judicial Magistrate, Howrah) on 15th September 2022 directed extradition of the appellant. The appellant filed Criminal Revision No. 135 of 2023 before the Calcutta High Court, which was dismissed on 25th January 2023. The appellant then appealed to the Supreme Court by special leave. During the appeal, the appellant filed an Interlocutory Application under Article 142 seeking dissolution of marriage.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 498A, 307, 506, 406, 323, 324, 405, 420, 379, 499, 500, 341, 342, 403, 504, 120B, 186, 188, 332
  • Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961: 3, 4
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: 12, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26, 31, 32
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: 9
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 125
  • Constitution of India: 142
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Invalidity Order for Scheduled Tribe Certificate. Petitioner Failed to Prove 'Bedar' Tribe Claim as School Records Showed 'Maratha' and No Other Documentary Evidence Was Prod...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Hears Petitions for Mandamus in TAIT-2022 Teacher Recruitment; Petitioners Seek Permission to Edit Self-Certification on Pavitra Portal. Court Examines Right of Candidates to Participate in Second Round Under Right of Children to Fr...