Search Results for "doctor's endorsement"

601 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 601 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2011

The criminal appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 23-2-2010 (or 23-2-2011) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations lacked consistency and corroboration, failing to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nasib Osman Pathan, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife, Seema, by setting her on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Abdul Riyaz Abdul Bashir, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Achalpur in Sessions Case No. 57/2005 for the murde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge. Single Stick Blow Not Sufficient to Prove Knowledge of Likely Death Under Section 304 Part I IPC.

The appellant, Bandu @ Bandya Mahendra @ Rashid Pathan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, in Sessions Case No.305 of 2014 for th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife by Pouring Kerosene and Setting Her on Fire — Dying Declarations Consistent and Reliable.

The appellant, Prakash Maruti Mane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of his wife Shobha under Section 302 IPC a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Compensation Order in Dishonour of Cheque Case — Mere Failure to Prove Case Not Sufficient for Compensation Under Section 250 CrPC. The court held that without a finding of false or vexatious complaint, compensation cannot be imposed under Section 250 CrPC.

The appellant, Prashant Jawarkar, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Dr. Ganesh Vasu,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Favor of Executor Despite Allegations of Suspicious Circumstances. Will executed by testatrix with firm signature and solicitor-drafted formality upheld as valid under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The plaintiff, Chittaranjan N. Negandhi, sought probate of a Will dated 24th May 1973 left by his mother, Bhanumati Narottamdas Chapsi. Bhanumati died...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Marriage and Inconsistent Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive and presence of accused at scene.

The appellant, Pramod Navneet Shirsat, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Akola, for the murder of Pratibha under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable Despite Driver Holding Licence for Non-Transport Vehicle. Driver's Licence to Drive Non-Transport Vehicle Covers Transport Vehicle of Same Class Under Section 10 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the owner of the offending vehicle challenging the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Harihar, which h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Jitendra @ Balu s/o Uttamrao Nagrale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal for offences under Sections 302 and 307 ...