Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife by Pouring Kerosene and Setting Her on Fire — Dying Declarations Consistent and Reliable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Prakash Maruti Mane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of his wife Shobha under Section 302 IPC and for criminal intimidation under Section 506 IPC. The prosecution case was that on 12th May 1996, at about 8.30 p.m., the appellant had a quarrel with his wife because she refused to give him money for liquor. He emptied kerosene from a stove into a can, poured it on her, and ignited her with a lamp. The victim's sister, Bayadabai (PW1), and the appellant's brother rushed to rescue her and extinguished the fire. The victim sustained severe burn injuries and gave three dying declarations to the police, the Executive Magistrate, and a doctor, all consistent in stating that the appellant had set her on fire. The appellant surrendered to the police the next day. The trial court relied on the dying declarations and convicted the appellant. On appeal, the Bombay High Court examined the dying declarations and found them to be voluntary, consistent, and reliable. The court noted that the victim was conscious and in a fit state of mind when making the declarations. The court held that the dying declarations were sufficient to sustain the conviction and dismissed the appeal.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Dying Declaration - Section 32 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 302, 506 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The appellant was convicted for murdering his wife by pouring kerosene and setting her on fire. The victim gave three consistent dying declarations implicating the appellant. The court held that the dying declarations were voluntary, consistent, and reliable, and thus sufficient to base the conviction. The appeal was dismissed. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dying declarations of the victim are reliable and sufficient to sustain the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 506 IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Sections 302 and 506 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • Section 32 Indian Evidence Act
  • 1872
  • reliability of multiple dying declarations
  • conviction under Section 302 IPC
  • Section 506 IPC
  • criminal intimidation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (04) 77

Criminal Appeal No.507 of 2001

2005-04-21

V.G. Palshikar, Smt. Nishita Mhatre

Mr. S.B. Shetye (for Appellant), Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal (for Respondent)

Prakash Maruti Mane

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and criminal intimidation.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the conviction and sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murdering his wife by setting her on fire.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted the appellant under Sections 302 and 506 IPC.

Issues

Whether the dying declarations are reliable and sufficient to sustain the conviction.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the dying declarations were not reliable. State argued that the dying declarations were consistent and voluntary.

Ratio Decidendi

Multiple consistent dying declarations, if voluntary and reliable, are sufficient to base a conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

By this Appeal the Appellant impugns the judgment and order dated 26th February 1997 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.229 of 1996 convicting and sentencing him under Section 302 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim has left three dying declarations which are consistent with each other and which point to the culpability of the Appellant.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur on 26th February 1997. He appealed to the Bombay High Court, which heard the appeal and dismissed it on 21st April 2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 506
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 32
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows CBI Appeal in Corruption Case, Directs Payment of Balance Fine or Custody for Default Sentence. Fine is a Sentence Under Section 53 IPC and Can Be Suspended Under Section 389 CrPC, But High Court's Order Did Not Suspend Fine or D...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife by Pouring Kerosene and Setting Her on Fire — Dying Declarations Consistent and Reliable.