Bombay High Court Considers Application to Vacate Arrest Order of Vessel in Admiralty Suit. The Court Examines Alleged Suppression of Facts and Non-compliance with Caveat under Section 148A CPC.
26 Jul 2022Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...
Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"
2241 result(s) found
Found 2241 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part and Refers Question of Law to Larger Bench in MSMED Act Dispute. Registration Under Section 8 of MSMED Act, 2006 Not a Precondition for Reference Under Section 18, but Issue Requires Authoritative Determination by Three-Judge Bench.
1 Jan 2025The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by NBCC (India) Ltd. against the State of West Bengal and others, concerning a dispute with M/s Saket Infra...
- 1463
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Sets Aside Order Dismissing Section 34 Petition. Court holds that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the award was patently illegal for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider the appellant's counterclaim.
14 Mar 2025The present appeal arises from a commercial dispute between M/s. Strategic Infra Services Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) and Mphasis Limited (respondent). The ...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of Micro, Small Enterprise Facilitation Council Under MSMED Act, 2006 — Reference Under Section 18 Maintainable Despite Arbitration Clause. The court held that the Facilitation Council has jurisdiction to entertain disputes between a buyer and a supplier under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, and such jurisdiction is not barred by an arbitration agreement.
27 Aug 2010The petitioners, M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and its Bhilai Steel Plant, challenged the jurisdiction of the Micro, Small Enterprise Facilitatio...
- 101
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes NCLT Approval and NCLAT Judgment in Bhushan Power CIRP, Remands for Fresh Resolution Plan. Approved Plan Set Aside Due to Inordinate Delay, Illegal Extension Clause, Waterfall Violation, and Non-Compliance with IBC Provisions Including Sections 30, 31, and 53.
2 May 2025The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of civil appeals under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) challenging the approval of ...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order Directing Undertaking Against Alienation of Property. Arbitration Petition Filed Under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Order Under Section 17 in a Long-Pending Development Dispute.
25 Mar 2019The Arbitration Petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed challenging the Arbitral Tribunal's interim order da...
- 15
High Court
Madras High Court Considers Section 11(6) Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Respondent's Limitation and Notice Validity Objections. Dispute Arises from Water Supply Agreement Dated 25.07.2013 Containing an Arbitration Clause.
26 Feb 2025The petitioner, a company engaged in supplying desalinized water, entered into a water supply agreement dated 25.07.2013 with the respondent. A disput...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Chamber Summons Filed by Defendant for Return of Plaint in Suit for Damages Under Lease Agreement. Application Seeks Transfer to Chennai Court Citing Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause; Court Also Considers Limitation and Cause of Action.
20 Aug 2013The matter pertained to a chamber summons filed by the defendant in a suit for damages. The defendant, Integrated Finance Co. Ltd., sought return of t...
- 54
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Memorandum of Agreement dated 14.06.2012 Contains Valid Arbitration Clause.
2 Jan 2019The petitioners, three individuals, filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole ...
- 222
High Court
High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute Despite Unstamped Agreement. Arbitration Clause Held Separable and Enforceable Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
2 Jan 2019The petitioners, Mr. M.N. Kumar, Mr. R. Venkata Krishna, and Mr. C.S. Mohan, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitrati...
- 20
