Search Results for "amended plaint"

1322 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1322 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application for Appointment of Court Receiver in Property Dispute Over Extra FSI Entitlement. Dispute concerns interpretation of Deed of Conveyance dated 27.09.1994 regarding additional area rights.

The Plaintiff, Erle Benedict Pereira, filed a suit seeking a declaration for extra FSI/additional area in respect of his entitlement under a registere...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Dispute Involving Multiple Previous Suits. Court Examines Maintainability Under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC and Relief Requirements Under Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Regarding Declaration Without Consequential Possession.

The dispute originated from a property suit O.S.No.156/2010 filed by seven plaintiffs seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction regarding ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Trust Land Exchange Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Oral Exchange Agreement from 1956 Not Proved; Possession Not Established; Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed.

The appellant, Shree Nootan Kelavani Mandal, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — No Fraud or Collusion Found. Consent Terms Recorded in Suit for Specific Performance of Share Purchase Agreement Were Valid and Binding, Not Vitiated by Fraud or Misrepresentation Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The judgment arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the original defendants (applicants) in a commercial suit seeking to set aside a consent decree d...