Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Time was not of essence but plaintiff's conduct showed lack of continuous readiness, disentitling him to discretionary relief under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 09.03.2006 for 51 cents of land at Rs.25,000 per cent. He paid Rs.4,80,000 as advance. The agreement fixed one year for completion. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant evaded execution despite his readiness. The trial court dismissed the suit, finding the plaintiff not ready and willing. On appeal, the High Court affirmed, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove continuous readiness and willingness as required under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The court noted that time was not of essence but the plaintiff's conduct, including lack of evidence of funds and delay, disentitled him to discretionary relief. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Specific Relief Act - Specific Performance - Readiness and Willingness - Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act, 1963 - The plaintiff must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract from the date of agreement till the decree. The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate such readiness as he did not produce evidence of sufficient funds or steps taken to complete the sale. (Paras 10-25)

B) Contract Law - Time of Essence - Sale Agreement - Time fixed for performance was one year, but the court held that time was not of the essence in this agreement for sale of immovable property. However, the plaintiff's conduct in delaying and not showing readiness disentitled him to specific performance. (Paras 15-20)

C) Evidence Act - Burden of Proof - Readiness and Willingness - Section 101 Evidence Act, 1872 - The burden is on the plaintiff to prove readiness and willingness. The plaintiff's failure to produce bank statements or other evidence of financial capacity led to the inference that he was not ready. (Paras 22-28)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff was ready and willing to perform his part of the contract and whether he is entitled to the discretionary relief of specific performance.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Judgment and decree of trial court dated 31.08.2017 in O.S.No.78 of 2010 confirmed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Specific performance
  • Readiness and willingness
  • Time not of essence
  • Conduct of plaintiff
  • Discretionary relief
  • Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act
  • 1963
  • Burden of proof
  • Continuous readiness
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (02) 109

A.S(MD)No.2 of 2018

2026-02-12

P.VADAMALAI

Mr.K.R.Laxman, Mr.V.Ramakrishnan

K.V.R.Kannan

G.Ramachandran (Died) represented by Saradha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of suit for specific performance of sale agreement.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought specific performance of sale agreement dated 09.03.2006.

Filing Reason

Defendant failed to execute sale deed despite receiving advance and plaintiff's readiness.

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed O.S.No.78 of 2010 on 31.08.2017.

Issues

Whether the plaintiff was ready and willing to perform his part of the contract? Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the discretionary relief of specific performance?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that he was always ready and willing, paid advance, and defendant evaded. Respondent argued that plaintiff was not ready and willing, failed to produce evidence of funds.

Ratio Decidendi

For specific performance, the plaintiff must prove continuous readiness and willingness from the date of agreement till decree. Failure to produce evidence of financial capacity or steps taken to complete the sale indicates lack of readiness, disentitling the plaintiff to discretionary relief under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

Judgment Excerpts

The plaintiff must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract. Time was not of the essence, but the plaintiff's conduct showed lack of readiness.

Procedural History

Suit O.S.No.78 of 2010 filed for specific performance. Trial court dismissed on 31.08.2017. Appeal filed under Section 96 CPC. Reserved on 13.11.2025, pronounced on 12.02.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Specific Relief Act, 1963: Section 16(c)
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 96
  • Evidence Act, 1872: Section 101
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Time was not of essence but plaintiff's conduct showed lack of continuous readiness, disentitling him to discretiona...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal Of Judicial Employee, Reinstates With Back Wages -- Disciplinary Proceedings Found Vitiated Due To Procedural Irregularities And Disproportionate Punishment For Five Days Absence