KAHC010069912016_1
10 Nov 2016...
Search Results for "Special General Body Meeting"
1343 result(s) found
Found 1343 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Concerning Mandatory Nature of State NOC for B.Ed. Colleges Recognised by NCTE. Petitions Highlight Conflict Between Central Recognition Under NCTE Act and State Policy Not to Grant Additional NOCs.
28 Sep 2005The matter involved two connected writ petitions before the Bombay High Court. Writ Petition No. 4769 of 2005 was filed by Shrinath Shikshan Prasarak ...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance of Redevelopment Agreement with Cooperative Society. Court holds that a developer cannot enforce an MoU and Development Agreement against a cooperative society when the society's general body has not validly passed a resolution under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and the agreements are not binding on the society.
6 Nov 2012The Plaintiffs, Mana Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated ...
- 321
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner's failure to obtain 70% slum dweller consent and submit documents within stipulated time justified termination under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.
9 Jan 2024The petitioner, Surjit Singh Arora, sole proprietor of M/s. Sukhamani Construction, was appointed as developer for a slum rehabilitation scheme under ...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant Cooperative Housing Society's Appeal in Land Allotment Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit for Declaration and Injunction. The Court held that the appellant failed to establish any legal right to the land as the resolution for allotment was subsequently revoked and no concluded contract was proved.
13 Dec 2013The appellant, Atchutanand Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a suit seeking declaration of its right to land admeasuring 1,14,000 square metres...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.
5 May 2026The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...
- 42
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Order Against Accused No.3 in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court held that sanction for prosecution is a mandatory condition precedent for taking cognizance against a public servant, and its absence renders the proceedings void ab initio.
26 Jun 2023The petitioner, Shri M.R. Seetharam, was arrayed as accused No.3 in Spl.C.C. No.656/2021 pending before the XXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions J...
- 175
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Engineering College to Participate in CAP Admissions Despite AICTE’s Reduction of Intake Capacity. The Court Held That the College’s Non-Listing on AICTE Website Should Not Affect Admission Process, Subject to Final Outcome.
3 Aug 2015The Petitioner, Saraswati Education Society’s Saraswati College of Engineering, an institution established in 1997 and offering undergraduate engine...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears and Disposes of Challenge to Withdrawal of Lecturer Approval by Vice Chancellor. The Writ Petition Raises Key Questions on the Authority of University Officials Over Appointments in Affiliated Colleges.
3 Aug 2012The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the withdrawal of approval of the petitioner's appointmen...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition by Developer Against Society in Redevelopment Dispute — Interim Injunction Granted to Protect Developer's Rights Pending Arbitration. The court held that the developer had a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
12 Sep 2023The judgment concerns three cross-petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from a dispute between a developer,...
- 48
