Search Results for "Karnataka Civil Services Rules 2006"

764 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 764 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Illegal Handcuffing and Parading in a Bailable Offence. The Court Deliberates on Police Conduct and Fundamental Rights Under Article 21 in Context of Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, a law student, faced five criminal complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, arising from dishonoured cheq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 as Valid Regulatory Legislation. High Court erred in striking down entire Act; provisions conflicting with UGC Act are severable.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment striking down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Correction of Date of Birth in School Records at Fag End of Service — Delay and Lack of Credible Evidence Lead to Dismissal. The appellant failed to prove his date of birth as 29-9-1959 and the suit was barred by limitation under Section 96 CPC.

The appellant, Sri B.S. Mahesha, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal Against Regularization of Workman by Industrial Tribunal. Workman's Services Regularized Due to Completion of 240 Days and Employer's Non-Compliance with Contract Labour Act.

The present Letters Patent Appeal was filed by the Chief Officer of Porbandar Nagarpalika (earlier known as Porbandar Chhaya Nagarpalika) against the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Decree for Specific Performance. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mrs. Kiran Nashine, filed two appeals against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Challenge to Reinstatement of Temporary Employees in Termination Dispute. Termination of Employees Without Prior Approval Under Section 58 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Held Illegal.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by Solapur University challenging a common order of the College Tribunal, Mumbai, dated 10 January 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Matter — Reinstatement Includes Continuity of Service. Division Bench erred in denying continuity of service benefits to appellant who was reinstated pursuant to a final judgment.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Gujarat High Court Division Bench which set aside a Single Judge's order granting continuity of service benefi...