Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Challenge to Reinstatement of Temporary Employees in Termination Dispute. Termination of Employees Without Prior Approval Under Section 58 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Held Illegal.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 57
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by Solapur University challenging a common order of the College Tribunal, Mumbai, dated 10 January 2012, and subsequent order dated 1 November 2012. The Tribunal had allowed appeals by the respondents (employees) and quashed the University's termination order, directing reinstatement. The University was constituted in 2004 under the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. In 2007, the State Government created 150 non-teaching posts for the University. The respondents were appointed on temporary basis against these posts. Their services were terminated by the University without following the procedure under Section 58 of the Act, which mandates prior approval of the Management Council for termination. The respondents challenged the termination before the Tribunal, which held that the termination was illegal and ordered reinstatement. The University argued that the respondents were temporary employees and their termination was valid. The High Court, after hearing both sides, held that the University's action was in violation of Section 58 of the Act. The Court noted that the Tribunal had correctly found that the termination was illegal and that reinstatement was the appropriate remedy. The High Court dismissed the petitions, upholding the Tribunal's order. The Court also directed that the respondents be reinstated with continuity of service and back wages as determined by the Tribunal.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Termination of Temporary Employees - Section 58 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - The University terminated temporary employees without following the procedure under Section 58 of the Act, which requires prior approval of the Management Council for termination of service of any employee. The Tribunal held that the termination was illegal and ordered reinstatement. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order, holding that the University cannot terminate employees without complying with the statutory provisions. (Paras 1-30)

B) Jurisdiction of College Tribunal - Reinstatement - Section 58 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - The Tribunal has jurisdiction to order reinstatement of employees whose termination is found to be illegal. The High Court affirmed that the Tribunal's order of reinstatement was proper and within its powers. (Paras 1-30)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of the respondents (temporary employees) by the petitioner-university was legal and whether the College Tribunal had jurisdiction to order reinstatement.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petitions and upheld the order of the College Tribunal directing reinstatement of the respondents with continuity of service and back wages.

Law Points

  • Termination of temporary employees without following statutory procedure is illegal
  • Reinstatement is proper remedy for illegal termination
  • Section 58 of Maharashtra Universities Act
  • 1994 requires compliance before termination
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014:BHC-AS:16888

Writ Petition No. 646 of 2013 (and connected petitions)

2014-08-01

G.S. Kulkarni

2014:BHC-AS:16888

Mr. P.N. Joshi with I.M. Khairdi for Petitioner, Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for Respondent No.1, Mr. A.D. Kango, AGP for Respondent No.2

Solapur University

Radhika Nadhukar Yele and Anr. (and similar in other petitions)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the College Tribunal which allowed appeals of employees and ordered reinstatement.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner (Solapur University) sought to quash the Tribunal's order and uphold the termination of the respondents.

Filing Reason

The University terminated the services of temporary employees without following the procedure under Section 58 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

Previous Decisions

The College Tribunal, Mumbai, by order dated 10.1.2012 and 1.11.2012, allowed the appeals of the respondents and directed reinstatement.

Issues

Whether the termination of the respondents by the University was legal and in compliance with Section 58 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. Whether the College Tribunal had jurisdiction to order reinstatement of the respondents.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the respondents were temporary employees and their termination was valid as per the terms of appointment. The respondents argued that the termination was illegal as it was done without following the procedure under Section 58 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, which requires prior approval of the Management Council.

Ratio Decidendi

The termination of temporary employees by a university without complying with the statutory requirement of prior approval under Section 58 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 is illegal. The College Tribunal has jurisdiction to order reinstatement in such cases.

Judgment Excerpts

By the impugned orders the Tribunal has allowed the appeals preferred by the Respondent No. 1 in each of these Petitions. The Tribunal has quashed and set aside the order dated 10th January, 2012 issued by the Petitioner and has directed reinstatement in service of the concerned Respondents.

Procedural History

The respondents were appointed on temporary basis by Solapur University. Their services were terminated. They appealed to the College Tribunal, which allowed the appeals and ordered reinstatement. The University challenged the Tribunal's order by filing writ petitions in the High Court. The High Court dismissed the petitions, upholding the Tribunal's order.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994: Section 58
  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Disposes of Appeal in Property Dispute, Directs Status Quo Pending Civil Suit. Unilateral Cancellation of Registered Sale Deed Held Subject to Adjudication by Competent Civil Court.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Service Tax Case: Donation for Exclusive Catering/Decoration Rights Not Chargeable to Service Tax. Consideration received by charitable trust for granting monopoly rights to caterer/decorator does not constitute 'ca...