Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

21779 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21779 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Objections to Maintainability and Limitation in Suit for Recovery of Trust Property. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950; Suit for Recovery of Shares by Public Charitable Trusts Not Barred by Limitation.

19 Sep 2016

The case concerned a notice of motion taken out by two public charitable trusts, the J.V. Gokal Charity Trust and Shree Krishna Foundation, against Co...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Writ Petition Challenging Administrative Tribunal Orders in Mundkarial Dispute. Key Issue Whether Mamlatdar Had Jurisdiction to Determine Mundkarial Rights When Reference Was Made Under Section 32 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975.

4 May 2018

The litigation originated from two civil suits filed in 1992 by M/s. Suvarn Rajaram Bandekar Discretionary Trust against one Armando Cardozo for remov...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears SEBI's Application to Recall Sanction of Composite Scheme in Fertilizers Merger Case. Securities Regulator Alleges Material Non-Disclosure and Accounting Violations in Scheme Involving Listed and Unlisted Companies Under Companies Act, 1956.

10 Sep 2015

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) filed applications on 21.02.2013 seeking recall of orders of the Bombay High Court dated 17.06.2011 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against High Court Transfer: Government Notification Appointing District Judge Invalid for Lack of Consultation Under Article 233 of Constitution. Invalid Notification Did Not Bind High Court Which Had Power to Transfer Officer.

7 Oct 1969

The petitioner, an Additional District and Sessions Judge in Bihar, challenged the Patna High Court's order transferring him from Arrah to Singhbhum a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Disposes Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Directing Accused to Address Labour Court in Criminal Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. Withdrawal of Criminal Complaint by Complainants Renders Maintainability Issue Academic, and Petition Disposed Without Deciding Whether Revision Under Section 44 is Alternative to Section 482 CrPC.

10 Mar 2016

The case involved a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Latur, which had ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Return of Shares and Dividends in Commercial Suit — Plaintiff Stockbroker Entitled to 11,25,000 ITC Shares and Accrued Dividends After Full Satisfaction of Debt Under One Time Settlement. Court Holds That Once Debt Is Fully Satisfied, Bank Must Return All Pledged Securities and Cannot Retain Them as Collateral for Other Debts.

10 Mar 2025

The Plaintiff, Shrikant G. Mantri, a stockbroker and registered member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, filed a commercial suit against Punjab National B...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Revenue’s Appeals Against Single Judge’s Order Quashing Section 153C Notices; Weighs Maintainability of Writ Petitions and Natural Justice Concerns.

22 Jan 2024

The present judgment arises from a batch of writ appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order dated 12.08.2022 passed by a Single Judge of the ...

41 42 43 44 45

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)