Search Results for "rule absolute"

12200 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12200 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Age Limit for Promotion of Anganwadi Sevikas to Supervisors. Rule 7(1)(c) of Service Entry Rules, 2021, prescribing 45 years as maximum age for promotion, held not violative of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution.

The petitioners, ten Anganwadi Sevikas from Akola district, challenged Rule 7(1)(c) of the Service Entry Rules, 2021, which prescribed a maximum age l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Induction of Non-Legislator Ministers with Less Than Six Months Remaining in Assembly Term. Conformity of Such Induction with Article 164(4) of the Constitution of India Questioned.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Vijay Namdeorao Wadettiwar (a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for possession based on title and prior possession; appellate court refused to re-appreciate evidence in second appeal under Section 100 CPC.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendant No.1 challenging the judgment and decree passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.238 of 1987 b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Decree Holders' Challenge to Executing Court's Order Permitting Objector to Lead Evidence in Execution Proceedings. Executing Court Has Discretion to Allow Oral Evidence Under Order 21 Rule 105 CPC When Objector Raises Substantial Questions Regarding Executability of Decree.

The petitioners, decree holders, filed two writ petitions challenging identical orders passed by the Court of Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010211662021_1

Background: The case involves multiple writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...