Search Results for "POCSO Act, 2012"

554 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 554 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court Order Summoning Additional Evidence in Asaram Bapu Conviction Case. Section 391 CrPC Cannot Be Used to Fill Gaps in Prosecution Case or to Introduce Evidence That Could Have Been Produced at Trial.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Rajasthan against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court dated 10.02.2022. The High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 IPC and 6 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Sri Paramesha, was convicted by the Additional Sessions and Special Judge, Hassan in Special Case No.146/2014 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in POCSO Case — No Violation of Article 22 or BNSS Provisions Found. Detention of Accused in Custody for Offences Under IPC, POCSO Act, and Immoral Traffic Act Held Lawful.

The petitioner, Ashok Sahadev Patil, filed a Habeas Corpus petition before the Bombay High Court challenging his detention in connection with C.R.No.4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Ten-Year Rigorous Imprisonment Affirmed. Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault Despite Delay in FIR.

The appellant, Amol S/o Raju Nindekar, was convicted by the Special Court, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i)(n) of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Benefit of Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 120B IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed against the judgment of the III Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Belagavi in S.C. No. 170/2016 dated 05.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Case After Marriage Between Appellant and Complainant. Court exercises Article 142 powers to quash conviction under Sections 354D and 506 IPC to protect matrimonial relationship.

The appellant was convicted by the Special Fast Track Court, Suryapet for offences under Sections 354D (stalking) and 506 Part I (criminal intimidatio...