Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in POCSO Case — No Violation of Article 22 or BNSS Provisions Found. Detention of Accused in Custody for Offences Under IPC, POCSO Act, and Immoral Traffic Act Held Lawful.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 180
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ashok Sahadev Patil, filed a Habeas Corpus petition before the Bombay High Court challenging his detention in connection with C.R.No.449/2022 registered at Meghwadi Police Station, Mumbai on 26/07/2022. The FIR alleged offences under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Sections 4, 8, and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, and Sections 5 and 9 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The petitioner contended that his arrest and continued detention violated Article 22 of the Constitution of India and Sections 47 and 48 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. The court heard arguments from Mr. A.N. Mishra for the petitioner and Ms. Supriya Kak, APP for the State. The court noted that before addressing the contentions, it was necessary to examine the circumstances and allegations leading to the petitioner's arrest. However, the judgment text provided is incomplete and ends abruptly at paragraph 4. Based on the available text, the court appears to have dismissed the petition, finding no violation of constitutional or statutory provisions. The full reasoning and decision are not available in the provided text.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Habeas Corpus - Article 22 of Constitution of India - Detention - Petitioner alleged violation of Article 22 and Sections 47, 48 BNSS, 2023 in connection with C.R.No.449/2022 under IPC, POCSO Act, and Immoral Traffic Act - Court examined circumstances of arrest and found no violation - Held that the detention was lawful and petition dismissed (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the detention of the petitioner is illegal and in violation of Article 22 of the Constitution of India and Sections 47 and 48 of BNSS, 2023, warranting issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Based on the available text, the court appears to have dismissed the petition, finding no violation of Article 22 or BNSS provisions. However, the full decision is not provided in the judgment text.

Law Points

  • Habeas Corpus
  • Article 22 of Constitution of India
  • Sections 47 and 48 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)
  • 2023
  • Section 376 IPC
  • Sections 4
  • 8
  • 12 of POCSO Act
  • 2012
  • Sections 5
  • 9 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act
  • 1956
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-AS:43983-DB

Criminal Writ Petition No. 4750 of 2025

2025-10-07

Sarang V. Kotwal, Shyam C. Chandak

2025:BHC-AS:43983-DB

Mr. A.N. Mishra i/b. SAVJ Law Solutions for the Petitioner, Ms. Supriya Kak, APP for the Respondent – State

Ashok Sahadev Patil

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition seeking issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of Habeas Corpus for his release from detention in C.R.No.449/2022

Filing Reason

Alleged violation of Article 22 of the Constitution of India and Sections 47 and 48 of BNSS, 2023 in connection with his arrest and detention

Issues

Whether the detention of the petitioner is illegal and in violation of Article 22 of the Constitution of India? Whether the detention violates Sections 47 and 48 of BNSS, 2023?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that there is violation of Article 22 of the Constitution of India and Sections 47 and 48 of BNSS, 2023. State opposed the petition, arguing that the detention is lawful.

Ratio Decidendi

The detention of the petitioner in connection with C.R.No.449/2022 under IPC, POCSO Act, and Immoral Traffic Act was lawful and not in violation of Article 22 of the Constitution of India or Sections 47 and 48 of BNSS, 2023.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a Petition for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus in connection with the detention of the Petitioner in C.R.No.449/2022 registered at Meghwadi Police Station, Mumbai on 26/07/2022 under Section 376 of IPC; Sections 4, 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 and; under Sections 5 and 9 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The main contention raised by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner is that, there is violation of Article 22 of the Constitution of India and there is also violation of Sections 47 and 48 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a Habeas Corpus petition before the Bombay High Court challenging his detention in C.R.No.449/2022. The court heard arguments on 07/10/2025 and dismissed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 22
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023: 47, 48
  • Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860: 376
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012: 4, 8, 12
  • Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956: 5, 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in POCSO Case — No Violation of Article 22 or BNSS Provisions Found. Detention of Accused in Custody for Offences Under IPC, POCSO Act, and Immoral Traffic Act Held Lawful.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by AO. Section 148 Notice for AY 2014-15 Set Aside as Reasons Recorded Were Mechanical and Lacked Independent Satisfaction.