Search Results for "Delhi Development Authority"

3163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Land Owner's Appeal in Consumer Case, Holding No Joint Liability for Developer's Default. Collaboration Agreement and Tripartite Agreement Did Not Impose Obligation on Land Owner to Flat Buyers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) allowing a complaint by flat buyers against a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of AAIFR Order Setting Aside BIFR's Exclusion of ULC Land from Sick Company's Rehabilitation Scheme. The Court Examines Whether the Remand for Modification Was Justified Under SICA and ULC Provisions.

The petitioner, Swayam Realtors and Traders LLP, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration of Title Over BDA Acquired Land — Petitioner Fails to Establish Possession or Title After 1971 Acquisition Notification Under City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945.

The petitioner, Sri Venu, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the respondents hav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020009812016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Appoints Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Loan Default Case Under Arbitration and SARFAESI Acts. Applicant Secures Protection for Mortgaged Property in Dispute with Respondents

The High Court of Bombay heard two connected applications filed by Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited against Inderjeet Sahni and others. The first ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment Order in PMLA Case for Lack of Scheduled Offence. Attachment of properties under Section 5(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 set aside as predicate offence was not a scheduled offence under PMLA.

The petitioners, Sunlight Housing Development Pvt. Ltd., Mukesh Doshi, Kaushal Doshi, and Mack Star Marketing Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions challeng...