Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC020009812016_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD
Admin
2026-08-23 16:34:05
  • 87
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC020009812016_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (04) 6

Writ Petition No. 100395/2016 (LA-RES) C/W Writ Petition Nos. 100396/2016, 100398-100399/2016, 100400/2016, 100401-100402/2016, 100403/2016, 100404/2016, 100405/2016, 100408/2016, 100409/2016, 100397/2016, 107653/2015 & 108183/2015, 107663/2015 & 108184-108185/2015, 107662/2015, 107652/2015 & 108071/2015, 109068/2015 & 109497-499/2015, 109069/2015, 109066/2015 & 109507-509/2015, 109067/2015, 109088/2015 (LA-RES)

2016-04-28

B. Veerappa

S.M. Kalwad, Madhusudan R. Naik, K. Vidyavati, G.K. Hiregoudar

Shivappa S/o Shankrappa Vadagalla and Others

State of Karnataka and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India challenging land acquisition notifications

Remedy Sought

Quash the impugned notifications dated various dates under Section 4(1) and Section 6(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Filing Reason

Acquisition of petitioners' lands for Upper Tunga Project

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4(1), 6(1)
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Land Acquisition Notification under Section 4(1) Notification under Section 6(1) Upper Tunga Project Writ Jurisdiction Articles 226 and 227

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Polluter Pays Principle in Tannery Pollution Case — Directs Comprehensive Compensation and Remediation for Environmental Degradation in Vellore District. The court affirmed that tanneries are strictly liable for ecological dam... 2026-09-17 16:44:01
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Claim for Interest on Delayed Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 2013 — Interest Awarded at 12% Per Annum from Date of Award to Payment. Section 80 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisitio... 2026-09-17 16:44:01
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition natural justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?