WRIT PETITION NO. 5539 OF 2017
5 Feb 2019The petitioner, M/s. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the Bombay High Court...
Search Results for "Deemed Permission"
3009 result(s) found
Found 3009 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Demolition of Commercial Structures in Protected Area of Virupapura Gaddi, Hampi. Constructions in Protected Area Declared Under Mysore Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1961 Are Illegal and Subject to Demolition by Hampi World Heritage Area Management Authority.
11 Feb 2020The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by owners of restaurants, guest houses, and other commercial establishments in Virupapura Gaddi, ...
- 239
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Resort Construction in CRZ Area. Petitioner failed to prove violation of CRZ Notification, 2011; court upholds administrative approvals.
18 Sep 2025The petitioner, Mohinder Kaur Paintal, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the construction of a resort by Respon...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Real Estate Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Agreement to Sell and Possession. Appellant failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
23 Apr 2024The appellant, Mohammed Zain Khan, filed a Second Appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the ...
- 131
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Disqualified Councillor in Municipal Disqualification Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Denial of Cross-Examination in Disqualification Proceedings Under Section 16(1)(h) and (i) of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 Renders Collector's Order Unsustainable.
25 Apr 2023The petitioner, Rohan Vishwanath Khedekar, was elected as a councillor of Ward No. 7 of Devgad Jamsande Nagarpanchayat in 2020. Respondent No. 2, Yoge...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Section 51 Notice in MRTP Act Case — Development Rights Not Extinguished by Lapse of Permission. Held that a notice under Section 51 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 cannot be issued for alleged breach of conditions when the development permission had already lapsed and the petitioner had acquired vested rights under a development agreement.
6 Oct 2022The petitioner, Galore Developers Private Limited, entered into an agreement on 23 March 2010 with the Solapur Municipal Corporation (respondent nos.1...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Pension to Ayurvedic College Teachers Who Voluntarily Retired or Resigned After Qualifying Service. Employees of aided Ayurvedic, Unani, and Homeopathic educational institutions are entitled to pension and gratuity benefits under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, read with the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.
28 Feb 2019The petitioners, five retired doctors and one other employee, were employed at various aided Ayurvedic, Unani, and Homeopathic educational institution...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Depositors' Petition Challenging Winding Up of Cooperative Bank — No Locus Standi for Individual Depositors Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Winding Up Order Under Section 107 of MCS Act is Final and Cannot Be Challenged by Individual Depositors; Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages.
21 Sep 2006The petitioners, Manda Ananda Salunkhe, Dropadabai Laxman Nalawade, and Mrs. Jatin Enterprises, were depositors and shareholders of Yeshwant Sahakari ...
- 186
High Court
Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Specific Performance of Development Agreement — Failure to Consider Limitation and Lack of Evidence of Agreement. Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenge succeeds as award based on letter dated November 4, 2003 read with unregistered document suffers from patent illegality and perversity.
12 Dec 2025The Bombay High Court set aside an arbitral award dated August 5, 2017, which had granted specific performance of a development agreement in favor of ...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Provision for Review Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Review petition under Section 114 CPC held not maintainable against order under Sections 27(1) and 27(2) of the Act.
16 Oct 2015The review petitioner, National Insurance Company Limited, filed a review petition under Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking reca...
- 115
