Bombay High Court Dismisses Depositors' Petition Challenging Winding Up of Cooperative Bank — No Locus Standi for Individual Depositors Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Winding Up Order Under Section 107 of MCS Act is Final and Cannot Be Challenged by Individual Depositors; Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 126
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Manda Ananda Salunkhe, Dropadabai Laxman Nalawade, and Mrs. Jatin Enterprises, were depositors and shareholders of Yeshwant Sahakari Bank Ltd., a cooperative bank registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act) and the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The bank was registered in 1968 and had 8,300 members and about 4,000 depositors, with deposits of approximately Rs. 1.38 crores. In 1992, the Reserve Bank of India declared the bank a weak bank. Subsequently, the bank was ordered to be wound up under the provisions of the MCS Act. The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking to challenge the winding up order and praying for the revival of the bank. They argued that the winding up was not in the interest of the depositors and that the bank could be revived. The respondents, including the liquidator, the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, and the ex-chairman, opposed the petition, contending that the winding up order was final and that the petitioners had no locus standi to challenge it. The court considered the provisions of Sections 107 and 110 of the MCS Act, which deal with winding up and appeals. The court held that the winding up order under Section 107 is final and cannot be challenged by individual depositors. The remedy of appeal under Section 110 is available only to the society, its members, or creditors in a representative capacity, not to individual depositors. The court further held that the petitioners' remedy, if any, lies in a civil suit for damages against the delinquent directors. The petition was dismissed as not maintainable, and the rule was discharged. No order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Winding Up of Cooperative Bank - Finality of Winding Up Order - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Sections 107, 110 - The petitioners, depositors and shareholders of a cooperative bank in liquidation, sought to challenge the winding up order and prayed for revival of the bank. The court held that the winding up order under Section 107 of the MCS Act is final and cannot be challenged by individual depositors. The remedy of appeal under Section 110 is available only to the society, its members, or creditors in a representative capacity, not to individual depositors. The court further held that the petitioners' remedy, if any, lies in a civil suit for damages against the delinquent directors. (Paras 1-10)

B) Cooperative Law - Locus Standi of Depositors - Challenge to Liquidation - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Sections 107, 110 - The court examined the locus standi of the petitioners, who were depositors and shareholders, to challenge the winding up. It held that depositors are not entitled to challenge the winding up order individually as the Act provides a complete code for liquidation. The court noted that the petitioners had not exhausted the remedy of appeal under Section 110, which is available only to the society or its creditors in a representative capacity. The petition was dismissed as not maintainable. (Paras 5-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether depositors and shareholders of a cooperative bank in liquidation have the right to challenge the winding up order and seek revival of the bank under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Winding up of cooperative bank under MCS Act is final and cannot be challenged by individual depositors
  • No right of hearing for depositors in liquidation proceedings
  • Section 107 of MCS Act provides for appeal only by specified persons
  • Depositors' remedy lies in civil suit for damages against delinquent directors
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (09) 94

Writ Petition (L) No. 1584 of 2006

2006-09-21

F.I. Rebello, Anoop V. Mohta

Mr. A.S. Desai for Petitioner, Mr. E.P. Bharucha with Mr. O.P. Pandya for R. No. 1, Mr. P.K. Dhakephalkar with Mr. G.W. Mattows for R. Nos. 8 and 9, Mr. A.Y. Sakhare with Mr. Sidhartha Karpe for R. Nos. 4 and 5, Dr. Virendra Tulzapurkar with Mr. A. Munshi and Mr. Kunal Damle for R. No. 7

Manda Ananda Salunkhe, Dropadabai Laxman Nalawade, Mrs. Jatin Enterprises

Yeshwant Sahakari Bank Ltd. (In liquidation), The Additional Commissioner for Cooperation & Registrar of Cooperative Societies, The Commissioner for Cooperation and Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Prataprao Krishna Salunkhe, The Depositors Association Yeshwant Sahakari Bank Ltd., Sabasad Seva Sangh, The Reserve Bank of India, The Hon’ble Minister for Cooperation, The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging winding up of a cooperative bank and seeking revival

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to challenge the winding up order and prayed for revival of the bank

Filing Reason

Petitioners, as depositors and shareholders, believed the winding up was not in their interest and that the bank could be revived

Previous Decisions

The bank was declared a weak bank by RBI in 1992 and subsequently ordered to be wound up under the MCS Act

Issues

Whether depositors and shareholders have locus standi to challenge the winding up order of a cooperative bank Whether the winding up order under Section 107 of the MCS Act is final and not subject to challenge by individual depositors

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the winding up was not in the interest of depositors and that the bank could be revived Respondents contended that the winding up order was final and petitioners had no locus standi to challenge it

Ratio Decidendi

The winding up order under Section 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 is final and cannot be challenged by individual depositors. The remedy of appeal under Section 110 is available only to the society, its members, or creditors in a representative capacity. Individual depositors have no locus standi to challenge the winding up; their remedy lies in a civil suit for damages against delinquent directors.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioners have averred that they are the depositors and shareholders of Respondent No. 1 a Cooperative Bank, registered under the provisions of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and now under liquidation. The Bank was registered in the year 1968 and commenced business of banking under the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, since 1968. In the year 1992, the Bank was declared a weak bank by the Reserve Bank of India. The winding up order under Section 107 of the MCS Act is final and cannot be challenged by individual depositors. The remedy of appeal under Section 110 is available only to the society, its members, or creditors in a representative capacity, not to individual depositors. The petitioners' remedy, if any, lies in a civil suit for damages against the delinquent directors.

Procedural History

The bank was registered in 1968. In 1992, RBI declared it a weak bank. Subsequently, it was ordered to be wound up under the MCS Act. The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2006 challenging the winding up and seeking revival. The petition was heard and dismissed on 21 September 2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: 107, 110
  • Banking Regulation Act, 1949:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Depositors' Petition Challenging Winding Up of Cooperative Bank — No Locus Standi for Individual Depositors Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Winding Up Order Under Section 107 of MCS Act is Final and Ca...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.