Search Results for "Arbitration award execution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Arbitration award execution"

1097 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1097 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Fresh Arbitration After Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Without Deciding Merits — Observations in Setting Aside Award Do Not Constitute Res Judicata. The Court held that setting aside an arbitral award under Sections 34/37 does not adjudicate the merits, and parties are free to arbitrate afresh under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Mar 2025

The applicant, Batliboi Environmental Engineering Ltd., had entered into a contract with Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) for construction ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Dismissal of Section 34 Petition in Joint Development Dispute. Developer Challenged Dismissal of Challenge to Arbitral Award Regarding Revocation of Power of Attorney and Ownership Rights in Constructed Property.

21 Feb 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor. The Court held that payment accepted under protest does not amount to accord and satisfaction, and an exclusion clause cannot bar claims for damages caused by the employer's own breach under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Sep 2017

The case arises from a construction contract between Vilayati Ram Mittal (P) Ltd. (the claimant/appellant) and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI/responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favor of Award Holder Against Award Debtor. Court Rejects Objections Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Non-Compliance, Incapacity, Natural Justice, and Public Policy.

15 Sep 2014

The case concerns the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award dated 17th January, 2011 passed in London, UK, in favor of Vitol S.A. (the award holder)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Under Section 37 Against Interim Order Under Section 9 in Property Development Arbitration. The Impugned Order Granted Conditional Relief Including Injunction and Appointment of Receiver Pending Arbitration.

27 Oct 2005

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent challenged an order passed by a le...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Section 34 Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petitioner Failed to Prove Non-Service of Arbitral Award Sent by Registered Post.

12 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Jasvinder Kaur, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 9...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Delivers Judgment on Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 13424 of 2026

18 Jun 2026

The matter pertained to a commercial arbitration petition filed by the developer, Wadhwa Estates and Developers (India) Private Limited, against respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Maritime Board Dispute Over Cargo Handling Charges. Court sets aside majority award directing payment at Rs.3 per metric tonne, remits matter for fresh consideration on applicability of 1995 or 1996 policy.

22 Jun 2017

The Maharashtra Maritime Board (Claimant) filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a m...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Appointment of Receiver in Share Pledge Dispute. Court upholds appointment of Court Receiver as receiver of pledged shares under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding that the appellant failed to make out a prima facie case for interference.

10 Aug 2019

The case involves two commercial appeals filed against an order of the learned Single Judge appointing the Court Receiver as receiver of certain pledg...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on MSMED Act to Larger Bench. Balancing statutory remedies with writ jurisdiction: Supreme Court deliberates over MSMED Act provisions and alternative remedies.

22 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India examines whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is maintainable against an order passed by the Micro...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)