High Court of Bombay Delivers Judgment on Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 13424 of 2026

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter pertained to a commercial arbitration petition filed by the developer, Wadhwa Estates and Developers (India) Private Limited, against respondent no. 1 society and respondent nos. 2 to 11, who were dissenting members. The dispute arose from a redevelopment project of Moon Craft Apartments Cooperative Housing Society Limited at Plot No.1485/1487, Shirley Rajan Road, Off Carter Road, Bandra (West), Mumbai 400 050. The society was formed around 1972, and the building was constructed in 1975, consisting of 38 residential flats and 7 garages, occupied by 36 members. In December 2021, the society resolved to redevelop the building, which was then about 49 years old. In a Special General Body Meeting on 5 December 2021, a unanimous resolution for redevelopment was passed. Subsequently, Palash PMC LLP was appointed as Project Management Consultant in a meeting on 4 September 2022. The petitioner was appointed as the developer in a meeting on 21 May 2023, and a No Objection Certificate was issued by the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies on 8 June 2023. In meetings on 18 August 2024 and 26 January 2025, the majority members approved the final draft of the Development Agreement and authorized its execution. Accordingly, on 31 March 2025, the petitioner, respondent no.1 society, and 22 consenting members executed and registered the Development Agreement. The agreement imposed obligations on the developer, including procuring MDP IOD from BMC within 9 months plus 2 months grace period, and on the members to submit Consenting Member Declarations. In case of default, the developer was to take legal steps against dissenting members. The petitioner obtained MDP IOD on 5 March 2026 and forwarded it to the society on 7 March 2026. The society informed all members by email on 6 March 2026 to execute declarations. By 24 March 2026, 32 of 38 members had submitted declarations, but respondent nos. 2 to 11 failed to submit their declarations or vacate their flats despite requests. The petitioner therefore sought interim directions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, pending constitution of an arbitral tribunal: (a) directing respondent nos. 2 to 11 to execute Consenting Member Declarations; (b) directing them to vacate their flats after Full IOD and notice; and (c) alternatively, appointing a Court Receiver under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The petition was heard and reserved for judgment on 11 June 2026, and pronounced on 18 June 2026. The provided judgment excerpt ends after reciting the facts and the reliefs sought, containing no further analysis, reasoning, or final order.

Issue of Consideration

COMM ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.13424 OF 2026

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (06) 77

Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 13424 of 2026

2026-06-18

Amit Borkar, J.

For petitioner: Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar, Mr. Tushar Guujar, Mr. Deep Madnani i/by SL Partners; For respondent No.1: Mr. Shanay Shah, Mr. J.R. Vakil i/by J.R. Vakil & Associates; For respondent No.2: Mr. Aurelius D’Silva, Ms. Reema Maurya i/by D’Silva & Co.; For respondent No.3: Dr. Abhinav Chandrachud, Mr. Altaf Khan, Mr. Akash Mangalgi, Mr. Janay Jain; For respondent No.4: Mr. Aniesh Jadhav i/by Mr. Shubham Choudhari; For respondent No.5: Mr. Nikhil Adkine, Mr. Avinash Bailmare; For respondent Nos.6 to 11: Mr. Amrut Joshi i/by Mr. Nikhil Adkine

Wadhwa Estates and Developers (India) Private Limited

1. Moon Craft Apartments Coop. Housing Society Limited, 2. Sajida Ul Haq, 3. Muthar Shaikh, 4. Maryana Ratus, 5. Sofia Shaikh, 6. Imtiaz Ahmed, 7. Seema Ashok, 8. Afzal Ahmed, 9. Sabeena Ahmed, 10. Imtiaz Ahmed, 11. Sabeena Ahmed

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Commercial arbitration petition seeking interim directions against dissenting members of a cooperative housing society for redevelopment of the building.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought directions that respondent nos. 2 to 11 execute Consenting Member Declarations and vacate their flats, or in the alternative, appointment of a Court Receiver under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Filing Reason

Respondent nos. 2 to 11, being dissenting members, failed to submit the required Consenting Member Declarations and did not vacate their flats despite the petitioner having obtained MDP IOD and the society's requests.

Judgment Excerpts

By filing the present arbitration petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction against respondent Nos. 2 to 11, who are stated to be dissenting members, to vacate their respective flats situated in respondent No.1 society, namely Moon Craft Apartments Cooperative Housing Society Limited... by 24 March 2026, 32 out of 38 members had submitted their declarations. However, respondent Nos. 2 to 11 did not submit their declarations.

Procedural History

Petition filed; reserved for judgment on 2026-06-11; pronounced on 2026-06-18.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XL Rule 1
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Disposal of Revenue Appeal. Court Directs Revenue Divisional Officer to Allow Legal Heir to Defend Appeal and Consider Civil Court Decree Before Passing Orders.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition for Patta Name Correction; Revenue Divisional Officer Directed to Consider Application in Eight Weeks. Petitioner to Provide Satisfactory Evidence of Correct Father's Name Before Rectification.