High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Purchase Tax Orders in Relation to Sugarcane Purchase Tax. Petitions Include Sugar Factories Disputing Tax Liability Under the Relevant State Legislation.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "separate notices"
1837 result(s) found
Found 1837 result(s)
High Court
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015
8 Mar 2016The judgment under consideration pertains to four appeals arising from a property dispute involving final plot no.267 of Town Planning Scheme IV, Mahi...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Reviews Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice Against Employer for Denying Permanent Status to Temporary Workers. Court Examines Whether Completion of 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Model Standing Orders Mandates Confirmation.
19 Sep 2006This batch of writ petitions was filed by Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. and one employee before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging a common...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Notice of Motion for Interim Eviction of Non-Cooperating Members in Housing Society Redevelopment. The Court examines the Society's plea under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 for mandatory orders against members who refuse to vacate despite a majority resolution.
28 Jul 2017Background: The matter arises from a suit filed by Vikram Delite Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., a cooperative housing society registered under the...
- 54
Tribunals
NCLAT Adjudicates Appeals Against NCLT Orders Directing Replacement of Resolution Professional. Issues Pertain to Applicability of Sections 97 and 98 of IBC to Part II CIRP and Interpretation of IBBI Bye-law 23A.
8 Jul 2025The appeals arise from insolvency proceedings of Hindusthan National Glass & Industries Limited. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) be...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Establishes Plaintiffs' Title and Entitlement to Partition. Court holds that concurrent findings of fact can be interfered with if perverse or based on no evidence, and that plaintiffs proved their 1/3rd share in suit property.
23 Mar 2017The case involves a second appeal arising from a partition suit. The original plaintiffs, Ratnakar Pralhad Deoras (since deceased, represented by lega...
- 27
Supreme Court
"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights
8 Nov 2024The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...
- 2176
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion. Non-Service of Requisition Copy Under Rule 2(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975 is Directory and Does Not Invalidate Motion When Sarpanch Had Notice and Participated.
28 Feb 2025The Petitioner, Priyanka Abhijeet Deodhare, was the Sarpanch of Village Kaddhe, Taluka Khed, District Pune. Elections to the Gram Panchayat were held ...
- 403
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Abetment of Suicide and Cruelty in Dowry Demand Case. The court held that the dying declaration of the deceased wife was reliable and the presumption under Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act applied, confirming the appellant's guilt under Sections 498A and 306 IPC.
29 Apr 2011The appellant, Kacharu Bhausaheb Sonawane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Sections 498A and 306 of the...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Holds That Purchaser of Property During Pendency of Suit Is Bound by Doctrine of Lis Pendens Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and That Will Deed Must Be Proved in Accordance with Law. The court held that the appellant, who purchased the property during the pendency of the suit, is bound by the decree, and the will deed was not duly proved as attesting witnesses were not examined.
18 Nov 2019The case involves a second appeal arising from a partition suit. The original plaintiffs, Shivaji and Kamlabai, claimed a 1/3rd share in the propertie...
- 139
