CRIMINAL CONFIRMATION CASE NO. 02 OF 2024
11 Nov 2025The case stems from Crime No. 634 of 2022 registered at Kalamna Police Station for multiple offences including murder (Section 302 IPC), attempted mur...
Search Results for "appeal under Section 154"
1507 result(s) found
Found 1507 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Challenge to Cooperative Court Orders in Service Disputes — Upholds Reinstatement and Back Wages for Employees. Cooperative Court and Appellate Tribunal orders reinstating employees with continuity of service and back wages upheld as the bank failed to prove misconduct and violated principles of natural justice.
11 Mar 2016The petitioner, The Maharashtra State Cooperative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Ltd., filed four writ petitions challenging identical judgme...
- 269
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mundkar Declaration — Upholds Concurrent Findings That Petitioners Failed to Prove Mundkar Status Under Section 8A of Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975. The court held that the burden of proof lies on the claimant and the concurrent findings of fact cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction unless perverse.
12 Oct 2012The petitioners, Shri Vassant Krishna Palyekar and Smt. Vanita V. Palyekar, filed a writ petition challenging the common judgment and order dated 05.0...
- 184
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Police Officer in SC/ST Act Case for Non-Registration of FIR — Failure to Register FIR Does Not Attract Section 217 IPC Without Intent to Save Offender from Legal Punishment.
13 Jun 2016The applicant, Jignesh Patel, a Station House Officer at Khanvel Police Station, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Setting Aside Winding Up of Co-operative Society — Minister Exceeded Revisional Powers Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The court restored the winding up order passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar under Section 102 of the Act, holding that the Minister could not substitute his own opinion without finding perversity or illegality.
7 Nov 2023The petitioner, Mateshwari Agro Chemicals, a partnership firm and creditor of respondent no.5 society (Sharad Sahakari Misra Khat Karkhana), filed a w...
- 112
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Applicability of Affordable Housing Notification to Petitioners' Land. Clause 3 of Notification Dated 8th February 2016 Quashed as It Modified Development Control Regulations Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
23 Sep 2022The petitioners, Anwar Hussain J. Thim and M/s. Amit Builders, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay ...
- 93
High Court
Special Court at Bombay adjudicates securities scam trial against seventeen accused — Allegations of defrauding Standard Chartered Bank of ₹890 crores through unbacked bank receipts and forged securities. Charges include criminal breach of trust, forgery, and conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code and trial conducted under the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.
30 Jan 2019The case arose from the 1991-92 securities scam that affected the Indian economy. The Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) had an Investment Banking Division...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Second FIR Registered on Complaint of Accused in Same Incident — Bar on Multiple FIRs for Same Offence Under Section 154 Cr.P.C. The court held that registration of a second FIR on same facts after charge sheet is filed is impermissible and amounts to abuse of process, and the Magistrate's order under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. cannot be used to direct a fresh FIR.
17 Apr 2017The applicants, who were accused in a suicide abetment case, filed a criminal application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of a second FIR r...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes State Notification Making Certain IPC Offences Cognizable and Non-Bailable Under Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 — State Government Lacks Power to Amend CrPC by Executive Notification. The Court held that Section 10 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 does not empower the State Government to amend the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the notification was ultra vires.
21 Jul 2010The petitioner, Shri Vishwajit P. Rane, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Notification dated...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Land Dispute Case. Court confirms life imprisonment for appellant under Section 302 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.
23 Mar 2021The case involves three criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Sessions Trial No.50 of 2016. The appellan...
- 48
