INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 499 OF 2012
14 Oct 2014The appeal before the High Court arose out of an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissing the assessee's appeal and upholdi...
Search Results for "adjoining building"
655 result(s) found
Found 655 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Property Tax Assessment Dispute. Rateable Value of Godown-cum-Office Fixed at Rs. 45,835/- Based on Standard Rent Under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.
20 Feb 2024The case involves an appeal by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under Section 218D of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challengi...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction Against Dispossession. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Suit for Possession Based on Title Was Barred by Limitation.
13 Apr 2022The present First Appeal arises from a judgment of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, in S.C. Suit No.5551/1990, where the suit was decreed in favor of the...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Refund of Transfer Fees Paid Under Coercion. Payment of 3% of consideration as transfer fees disguised as repair fund contribution held illegal and recoverable with interest under Section 22 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
17 Feb 2010The petitioner, Bharatiya Bhavan Cooperative Housing Society Limited, challenged the orders of the First Cooperative Court and the Maharashtra State C...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Eviction Notice Under Public Premises Act — Tenant's Rights Upheld. The Court held that premises owned by a nationalised company not taken over by the Central Government are not 'public premises' under Section 2(e) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, and the eviction notice was invalid.
7 Jun 2010The petitioner, Dr. Suhas H. Pophale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order of the P...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction for Restoration of Possession in Suit for Specific Performance and Possession — Plaintiff Establishes Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in His Favor.
13 Oct 2025The plaintiff filed an interim application seeking temporary injunction for restoration of possession of the suit premises during the pendency of the ...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Redevelopment Agreement — Appellant Entitled to Specific Performance of Flat Allotment. Court held that the appellant was entitled to the entire 830 sq. ft. flat as per the agreement, not merely 562.5 sq. ft. free of cost, and that the learned Single Judge erred in restricting the relief.
20 Oct 2015The appellant, Kedar Chandrakant Berde, was the original plaintiff in a suit against Rishabraj Housing and Virangula Cooperative Housing Society Limit...
- 58
High Court
High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench Considers Confirmation of Death Sentence Awarded in Sessions Trial for Kidnapping and Murder of Minor Child. Conviction Under Sections 364A, 302, 201 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Ransom Call, and Discovery of Body Under Section 27 Evidence Act.
5 May 2016The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench was seized of a confirmation case (Criminal Confirmation Case No. 1 of 2016) and two connected cr...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Eviction Notices under Slum Act in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Petitioners Challenged Eviction Notices Issued under Sections 33 and 38 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, Alleging Lack of Section 3C(1) Declaration.
26 Apr 2006The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Om-Sai Darshan Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) an...
- 39
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Cantonment Board's Power to Remove Encroaching Kiosk Over Public Drain Under Section 187(1) of Cantonments Act, 1924. A kiosk constructed without permission on a stone projection over a drain belonging to the Cantonment Board was held to be governed by Section 187(1) and not Section 185(1), as the structure encroached on public property, and the Board's action within 18 years was within the 30-year limitation.
9 Apr 1969The dispute arose when the Cantonment Board, Meerut, issued notices under Section 187 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, to the owner of a shop for removal...
- 21
