KAHC010403282026_2
23 Jul 2026The petitioner, a partnership firm, challenged the award of a rate contract for supply of Liquid Sodium Hypochlorite Solution 5% 5ltr (drug code 430) ...
Search Results for "Karnataka Civil Services Rules 2006"
764 result(s) found
Found 764 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Permanency for LIC Apprentices — Apprentices Act, 1961 Overrides Industrial Disputes Act. Apprentices engaged under a statutory scheme are not employees and have no right to absorption.
18 Aug 2016The petitioners, engaged as apprentices by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under the Apprentices Act, 1961, filed writ petitions seeking...
- 244
High Court
High Court of Bombay Passes Interim Orders Directing Restoration of Lake and Prevention of Mangrove Destruction in Navi Mumbai. Modification of Development Plan to Permit Golf Course Raised Public Interest Concerns.
1 Nov 2018The public interest litigations were filed to address the systematic destruction of mangroves and wetlands in Navi Mumbai. The petitioners in PIL 218/...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.
14 Jun 2019The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...
- 168
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO.4520 OF 2014
30 Apr 2015The writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity and propriety of a notification dated January 29, 2014, issued by the Finance Department of ...
- 10
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Trademark Infringement Case — Order Rejecting Rejection of Plaint Set Aside. The court held that the trial court erred in dismissing the application under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC for return of plaint, as the suit lacked cause of action within its territorial jurisdiction.
26 Jun 2015The petitioner, M/s. Tata SIA Airlines Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order da...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Municipal Council Challenging Regularization Order — Temporary Appointment Without Selection Confers No Right to Regularization. Industrial Court's direction to regularize a junior clerk as Tax Inspector set aside as appointment was temporary, without regular selection process, and contrary to recruitment rules under Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.
6 May 2024The Pen Municipal Council challenged the Industrial Court's order directing regularization of Respondent No.1 as Tax Inspector. Respondent No.1 was in...
- 474
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Pension Under Rule 110 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Court Finds Rule 110 Does Not Support Grant of Pension to Daily Wager with Less Than 10 Years Permanent Service As It Pertains Only to Calculation of Pension After Qualifying Service.
3 Mar 2016The petitioner, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, an agricultural university, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Industrial Court da...
- 10
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Forest Officer in Tree Cutting Case — Lack of Opportunity of Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Petitioner's Liability for Alleged Loss Cannot Be Fixed Without Prior Show Cause Notice Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963.
16 Jan 2015The petitioner, an Indian Forest Service officer allotted to Karnataka, was selected and appointed in 1986 and rose to the cadre of Chief Conservator ...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Retired Employee Against State's Challenge to Lok Nyayalaya Order. The Court held that the Lok Nyayalaya's order directing pensionary benefits was binding and the State could not bypass it by filing a writ petition without exhausting alternative remedies.
7 Mar 2006The appeal arises from a judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court allowing a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra and the Mahara...
- 139
