Search Results for "Compulsory Acquisition"

531 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 531 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Appeal in Service Suspension Case; Rule that Order Effective from Issue Date under Punjab Civil Services Rule 3.26(d). Suspension Order Communicated Prior to Retirement Valid Regardless of Receipt, Allowing Disciplinary Dismissal.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the State of Punjab against a High Court decision quashing the dismissal of a government servant, Khemi Ram....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by State Authorities in Project Affected Person Certificate Case. Landowner whose land was acquired for canal construction held entitled to rehabilitation certificate under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986.

The case involves a second appeal by the Collector and District Rehabilitation Officer against a judgment of the Additional District Judge, Amravati, ...