Search Results for "individual hardship"

728 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 728 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment in Minority School Despite Lack of Prior Approval. Education Officer's order returning proposal set aside as minority institution's right under Article 30 not subject to prior approval for compassionate appointment.

The petitioner, Mahadev Rama Kaikadi, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 17/09/2016 passed by Respondent No.2, the Education Officer, S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal as Not Maintainable Against Single Judge Order in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Appeal Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Not Maintainable Where Single Judge Exercises Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Over Civil Court Orders.

The case arose from a landlord-tenant dispute. The respondents (landlords) had filed a civil suit for eviction of the appellant (tenant). The trial co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Victim Compensation Appeals Under Section 357A CrPC — State Must Compensate Victims Even if Accused Acquitted or Untraced. The court held that victim compensation is a mandatory duty of the State, not dependent on conviction of the accused.

The judgment concerns four criminal appeals (Criminal Appeal Nos. 991, 992, 331, and 854 of 2011) heard together by the Bombay High Court. The appeals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Common Cross-Examination in Eviction Suits to Prevent Prejudice to Tenants. Trial Court's Order Dismissing Application for Common Cross-Examination Set Aside Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, tenants in four eviction suits filed by the respondent landlord society, sought common cross-examination of the society's sole witnes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...