Search Results for "award not speaking"

1106 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1106 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Family Settlement Dispute. Court grants status quo order to protect assets pending arbitration under family settlement agreement.

The petitioner, Mukesh J. Shah, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim relief pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Berth Reservation Agreement — Restores Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s.X-Press Container Lines (UK) Ltd., entered into a Berth Reservation Agreement with the respondent, the Board of Trustees of the Por...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Government Permission for Ford India Plant Closure, Dismisses Workers' Challenge. Closure Permission Under Section 25-O of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Valid as Government Considered All Relevant Factors and Provided Compensation.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by 59 workers of Ford India Private Limited challenging the Government Order G.O.Ms.No.171 dated 28....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Raymond Limited's Appeals in Central Excise Cenvat Credit Dispute. Cenvat Credit of AED (T&TA) on Inputs Can Be Utilized for Payment of BED on Final Products.

The appellant, Raymond Limited, is a company manufacturing blankets from woollen fibres. The blankets attract only Basic Excise Duty (BED) and not Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Canal Construction Contract — Upholds Arbitrator's Award on Premium Rate at 93.12% for Extra Work, Remits Claim No.8 for Reconsideration, and Restores Interest at 12% Per Annum

The dispute arose from a contract dated 05.02.1985 between Chandigarh Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. (claimant) and the State of Punjab (opposite party) f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on rate analysis and rejection of counterclaims under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Union of India, through the Executive Engineer, CPWD, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging ...