Search Results for "arrest panchnama"

725 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 725 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Benefit of Doubt Given to Accused. Extra-judicial confession and circumstantial evidence found insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt under Section 302 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge (Atrocities on women) and 3rd Additional Sessions Judge dated 28.10.1999 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Gopal Shankarappa Rathod, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, for the murder of his wife Savita under Section 302 IPC and se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Cruelty in Bride Burning Case — Dying Declaration Recorded by Police Constable Held Admissible. The court found the dying declaration reliable and corroborated, affirming life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Datta s/o Kisan Gaikwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga in Sessions Case No. 23 of 2005 for the murder of his w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The appellant, Shankar Maruti Bamne, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, for the murder of Ranganath Karande under Section 302...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Simple Hurt in Rape Case Acquittal Appeal — Appellants Acquitted of Rape but Convicted Under Section 323 IPC for Assaulting Prosecutrix.

The appellants, Sonu Babu Pival and Kanta Sonu Pival, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Pune on 14.8.1996 in Sessions Case No.379 of 1995. They we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution in Attempt to Murder Case. Appellants failed to engage counsel for ten years after advocate returned brief, leading to dismissal of appeal against conviction under Sections 307/34 IPC.

The appellants, Kishor Kamlakar Patil and Abhay Parshuram Bhagat, were convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, in Session Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Pramod Baban Sonawale, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of his uncle Vinod Sonawale....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Inconsistencies in Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of dowry or harassment leading to death.

The appellant, Vikram Babasaheb Jadhav, was convicted by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge-1, Ambejogai, for offences under Sections 302 and 498A o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Raju S/o Bhimrao Girnare, was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana, for offences punishable under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Sole Eyewitness, Being Brother of Deceased, Was Not Credible and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Prosecution Case.

The case pertains to the murder of one person, for which the appellants (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judg...