Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Cruelty in Bride Burning Case — Dying Declaration Recorded by Police Constable Held Admissible. The court found the dying declaration reliable and corroborated, affirming life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 16
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Datta s/o Kisan Gaikwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga in Sessions Case No. 23 of 2005 for the murder of his wife Rukminibai under Section 302 IPC and for cruelty under Section 498-A IPC. The incident occurred on 29.8.2005 when the appellant demanded money from the deceased, and upon her refusal, he beat her, sprinkled kerosene from a lamp on her, and set her on fire. The deceased succumbed to burns. The trial court relied on the dying declaration recorded by a police constable (PW3) and other evidence. The appellant appealed, arguing that the dying declaration was not recorded by an Executive Magistrate and thus was inadmissible. The High Court, after hearing arguments, held that a dying declaration recorded by a police constable is admissible under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, provided it is truthful and voluntary. The court found that the dying declaration inspired confidence and was corroborated by medical evidence and other circumstances. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Dying Declaration - Admissibility - Section 32(1) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Dying declaration recorded by a police constable is admissible if it is truthful and voluntary and inspires confidence - The court held that the dying declaration in this case was reliable and corroborated by medical evidence and other circumstances, and thus the conviction under Section 302 IPC was upheld (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dying declaration recorded by a police constable is admissible and reliable, and whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC (life imprisonment) and Section 498-A IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration recorded by police constable is admissible if it inspires confidence
  • Section 32(1) of Indian Evidence Act
  • 1872
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 498-A IPC
  • Section 306 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (08) 27

Criminal Appeal No. 639 of 2008

2010-08-02

S.B. Deshmukh, S.S. Shinde

Mrs. Geeta Deshpande (for appellant), Mr. N.N. Jadhav (A.P.P. for respondent)

Datta s/o Kisan Gaikwad

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and cruelty

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the trial court's judgment convicting him for murder and cruelty

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC (life imprisonment) and Section 498-A IPC (no separate sentence) on 12.2.2007

Issues

Whether the dying declaration recorded by a police constable is admissible and reliable Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that dying declaration was not recorded by Executive Magistrate and thus not in accordance with law Respondent argued that dying declaration was truthful and voluntary, and conviction was proper

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration recorded by a police constable is admissible under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 if it is truthful, voluntary, and inspires confidence. The court found the dying declaration reliable and corroborated by medical evidence and other circumstances, thus upholding the conviction.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is filed challenging the final judgment and order dated 12.2.2007, passed by the Additonal Sessions Judge, Omerga in Sessions Case No. 23 of 2005. The background facts of the case are as under:- On 29.8.2005, the appellant accused asked his wife deceased Rukminibai to give him amount from her wages.

Procedural History

The appellant was tried and convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga on 12.2.2007 in Sessions Case No. 23 of 2005. He appealed to the Bombay High Court, which dismissed the appeal on 2.8.2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 498-A, 306
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 32(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Cruelty in Bride Burning Case — Dying Declaration Recorded by Police Constable Held Admissible. The court found the dying declaration reliable and corroborated, affirming life imprisonment under S...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under M...