KAHC020009812016_1
28 Apr 2016...
Search Results for "Village Development Committee"
1082 result(s) found
Found 1082 result(s)
High Court
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Gram Panchayat's Petition Against Temple's Installation of CCTV Cameras. Right to Privacy and Security of Temple Upheld Over Panchayat's Claim of Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.
26 Nov 2018The petitioner, Gram Panchayat of Shani Shingnapur, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the respondent temple (Shri Shaneshwar Devasthan...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Chairman's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Agriculture Produce Market Committee Case — Notice of Motion Held Valid Despite Absence of Some Directors' Signatures. Court Declines to Interfere with Statutory Proceedings Under Section 14(4) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, Directs Petitioner to Raise Objections Before Presiding Officer.
12 Feb 2014The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, was the Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Katol. He filed a writ petition challenging the ...
- 152
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Delegate Nomination Dispute in Karnataka Milk Federation; Interim Order Allows Petitioner to Cast Sealed Vote. Challenge to Regional Commissioner's Authority Under Section 28-A(4-B) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.
7 Apr 2020The writ petitions concerned a dispute over the nomination of a delegate to the apex milk co-operative federation in Karnataka. The petitioner was a m...
- 21
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Delegate Nomination Dispute for KMF President Election. Exclusion from Voter List and Commissioner’s Intervention Challenged Under Section 21(2) and Section 28-A(4-B) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act.
7 Apr 2020The case involved a dispute concerning the right of a delegate to vote in the election for the President of the Karnataka Milk Federation (KMF), an ap...
- 36
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging DRAT Order on Sale of Secured Asset under SARFAESI Act. The Court Examines Whether Sale on 'As Is Where Is' Basis Was Validly Confirmed and Whether DRAT Erred in Setting It Aside.
1 Dec 2016The matter arises from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, Asset Rec...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.
17 Mar 2025The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...
- 702
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SRA Termination of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Developer Failed to Complete Project Within Stipulated Time and Did Not Comply with Development Agreement and SRA Conditions.
12 Apr 2024The Petitioner, Shailesh Mulchand Savla, sole proprietor of M/s. Kunal Builders & Developers, filed a Writ Petition challenging the termination of his...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Process of Agriculture Produce Market Committee — No Interference in Mid-Election Process Under Article 226. Inclusion of Names in Voters List Cannot Be Challenged After Election Process Has Commenced; Remedy Lies in Election Petition Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.
22 Jan 2016The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Chandrashekhar Shivram Mudkanna and Shamshoddin Ghudulal Jamadar against the State of Maharashtra...
- 159
