Search Results for "Private property"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Private property"

5490 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5490 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners Challenge Notifications and Awards Under Bangalore Development Authority Act Asserting Lapse Under Section 24 of 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed between 2013 and 2015 by multiple landowners against the State of Karna...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapsing Under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The petitions sought declarations that acquisition proceedings under the Bangalore Development Authority Act and Mysore Urban Development Authority Act had lapsed due to non-compliance with Section 24 of the 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.

10 Mar 2016

Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...

High Court

Karnataka High Court examines claims of land acquisition lapsing under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in writ petitions against Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority. The petitioners sought declarations that acquisition had lapsed under Section 24 of the 2013 Act, citing non-compliance with statutory timelines.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions on Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Land Acquisition Proceedings Challenged for Non-Compliance with Provisions of the New Land Acquisition Law.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various landowners against the State of Karnataka, the Mysore Urban ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Declares Demolition of Shop without Notice Illegal under Section 23 of Karnataka State Highways Act, 1964. Tenant's Possession Protected When Authorities Demolish Building Without Following Procedural Mandate.

4 Jul 2024

The petitioner was a tenant running a textile shop in a building at Magadi Town, measuring 19 feet by 76 feet, referred to as Schedule-B property. He ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Against Service Tax on Seed Supply and Allows Writ Against Sales Tax on Franchise Agreement. Technology-Embedded Seed Supply Held to Be a Sale Under MVAT Act, While Franchise Licensing Held to Be a Service Under Finance Act.

11 Aug 2016

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard together two writ petitions concerning the tax characterisation of commercial transactions under the serv...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Interim Order in SARFAESI Act Case as Writ Petition Against Private Asset Reconstruction Company Not Maintainable. The Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India does not lie against a private ARC, and the proper remedy is an appeal under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002.

12 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from writ petitions filed by borrowers, Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir and St. Ann's Education Society, against Phoenix ARC Private Lim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Victim Compensation Appeals Under Section 357A CrPC — State Must Compensate Victims Even if Accused Acquitted or Untraced. The court held that victim compensation is a mandatory duty of the State, not dependent on conviction of the accused.

27 Apr 2012

The judgment concerns four criminal appeals (Criminal Appeal Nos. 991, 992, 331, and 854 of 2011) heard together by the Bombay High Court. The appeals...

38 39 40 41 42

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)