Search Results for "IPC Section 376"

1220 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1220 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Summons Against Accused Not Named in Police Report Under Section 190(1)(b) CrPC. Magistrate Cannot Summon Persons Not Named in Police Report or Column (2) of Report, Proper Course is Under Section 319 CrPC After Evidence Collection.

The Supreme Court addressed an appeal concerning the power of a Magistrate to summon an individual not named in a police report under Section 190(1)(b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Raju S/o Bhimrao Girnare, was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana, for offences punishable under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor Sister-in-Law by Brother-in-Law in Rape Case — Evidence of Victim Credible Despite Lack of Medical Evidence. The court held that the sole testimony of the victim, if credible, is sufficient to sustain a conviction under Section 376 IPC.

The appellant, Mohd. Sharif, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 376 and 506 (Part I) of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Criminal Appeal Challenging Conviction for Rape of Cousin Sister Resulting in Pregnancy. DNA Report Established Accused and Victim as Biological Parents of Child Born Under Sections 376, 376(2)(f), 376(2)(n) Indian Penal Code.

The appeal arises from a judgment of conviction rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Case No. 55 of 2020 dated 20.8.2022. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor in Absence of Direct Evidence of Penetration. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Report Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC.

The appellant, Deepak Shankarrao Borkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 7 of 2012 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Rape Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bhaulal S/o Dokraji Reswal, was convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the II Additional Adhoc Sessions Judge, A...