Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor Sister-in-Law by Brother-in-Law in Rape Case — Evidence of Victim Credible Despite Lack of Medical Evidence. The court held that the sole testimony of the victim, if credible, is sufficient to sustain a conviction under Section 376 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 158
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Mohd. Sharif, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 376 and 506 (Part I) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for raping his wife's younger sister. The appellant married the victim's sister on 5 October 2010 and started residing with his wife in the in-laws' house. During that period, he would wake the victim at night, take her to the gallery, and forcibly have sexual intercourse with her. The victim did not disclose the incidents due to fear and threats that the appellant would divorce her sister. Later, the appellant and his wife moved to Govandi, and the victim, upon her mother's instructions, stayed with them, where the appellant continued to rape her. The victim eventually left after a quarrel with her sister and started working at Byculla, but was forced to return to the appellant's house. The prosecution examined the victim (PW1), her mother (PW2), and the investigating officer (PW3). The trial court convicted the appellant, sentencing him to 10 years rigorous imprisonment for rape and 1 year for criminal intimidation. The appellant appealed to the Bombay High Court. The High Court, after hearing arguments and perusing the evidence, found the victim's testimony to be credible and trustworthy. The court noted that the victim's evidence was consistent and corroborated by her mother's testimony regarding the threats. The court held that the conviction was sustainable and dismissed the appeal, confirming the sentences.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Rape - Conviction based on sole testimony of victim - The court held that the testimony of the prosecutrix is credible and trustworthy, and corroboration is not necessary in law for conviction for rape. The appeal against conviction was dismissed. (Paras 1-14)

B) Criminal Law - Criminal intimidation - Threat to divorce sister - The appellant threatened the victim that he would divorce her sister if she disclosed the rape, which constitutes criminal intimidation under Section 506 IPC. (Paras 1-14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 376 and 506 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentences under Sections 376 and 506 (Part I) IPC confirmed.

Law Points

  • Rape conviction can be based solely on testimony of victim if credible
  • Section 376 IPC
  • Section 506 IPC
  • Criminal Appeal against conviction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (03) 92

Criminal Appeal No.1030 of 2013

2016-03-17

Abhay M. Thipsay, J.

Shri K.M. Mhatre for Appellant, Shri A.R. Patil APP for Respondent, Shri Satyavrat Joshi Amicus Curiae

Mohd. Sharif S/o. Latifur Rehman Shaikh @ Bilal

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for rape and criminal intimidation.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the trial court and sentenced to 10 years RI for rape and 1 year RI for criminal intimidation.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant on 14 August 2013.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 376 IPC is sustainable based on the sole testimony of the victim. Whether the conviction under Section 506 IPC is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the victim's testimony is not credible and lacks corroboration. State argued that the victim's testimony is trustworthy and sufficient for conviction.

Ratio Decidendi

The testimony of the prosecutrix in a rape case is credible and trustworthy, and corroboration is not necessary in law for conviction. The threat to divorce the sister constitutes criminal intimidation.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant is alleged to have raped the younger sister of his wife. The victim did not disclose the incidents to any of her family members as she was scared of the appellant and as the appellant had threatened to the victim that he would divorce her sister.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay on 14 August 2013. He appealed to the Bombay High Court, which heard the appeal and dismissed it on 17 March 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 376, 506 (Part I)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Clarifies Referee Bench's Jurisdiction in Consumer Protection Act Reference. Referee Bench Cannot Decide Appeal Itself and Must Answer Referred Questions Before Returning Matter to Referring Bench Under Section 58(3), Consumer Protectio...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Accused in Bigamy Case for Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Abetment. Petitioner, accused of abetting bigamy under Section 494 IPC read with Sections 109 and 114 IPC, discharged as complaint lacked specific al...