Search Results for "upper age limit"

188 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 188 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Attempt Limit for PwBD Candidates in Civil Services Examination. Classification Between SC/ST and OBC/General PwBD Candidates Held Reasonable Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, a person with 57% multiple disability (locomotor and low vision), challenged Rule 3 of the Civil Services Examinatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Age Relaxation Denial for EWS Candidates in Judicial Recruitment. EWS Category Not Entitled to Age Relaxation Under Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 as Relaxation Only for Backward Classes.

The petitioners, four individuals belonging to the Economically Weaker Section (EWS), challenged a communication dated 31st January 2022 from the Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by ECIL, Restores Single Judge Order Denying Age Relaxation to Outsourced Workers. Division Bench's Direction to Permit Participation in Selection Set Aside as Respondents Were Not Entitled to Age Relaxation Under Notification.

The case involves an appeal by The Electronic Corporation of India Ltd. (ECIL) against a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicatur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit Seeking Removal of Managing Director on Ground of Age Limit Under Companies Act, 2013. Section 196(3)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 Held Not Retrospective and Does Not Automatically Terminate Existing Appointments.

The plaintiff, a director of Ultramarine & Pigments Limited, filed a suit seeking an order to restrain the 2nd defendant, the Chairman and Managing Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Employment Exchange Registration Case — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review Cannot Be Used as an Appeal and Mere Change of View Not Ground for Review.

The judgment pertains to two Civil Review Applications (No. 6669/2006 and No. 6716/2006) filed by Anil s/o Bajirao Badgujar against the State of Mahar...