High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Pension Benefit Case — Additional Pension Payable from Date of Attaining 80 Years, Not from Date of Government Order. The Court upheld the Single Judge's order granting additional pension to a retired Assistant Engineer from the date he attained 80 years, rejecting the Corporation's contention that he was ineligible until that date.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Hubballi-Dharwad Municipal Corporation appealed against an order of a Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka allowing a writ petition filed by S.V. Budapanahalli, a retired Assistant Engineer. The State Government had passed an order on 13.10.2010 increasing pension under different slabs for government servants who retired on or after 1.7.1993 and attained the age of 80 and above. The respondent, born on 1.5.1935 and retired, sought the benefit of this Government Order. His request made on 10.10.2014 was rejected by the appellant on 28.10.2014 on the ground that he was ineligible for 20% additional pension until he attained the age of 80. He challenged the rejection in a writ petition, which was allowed by the Single Judge on the premise that both parties had submitted that the issue was covered by an order dated 3.9.2014 in W.P.No.105189/2014. The Division Bench, after hearing the appeal, held that the respondent attained the age of 80 on 1.5.2015 and was entitled to additional pension from that date. The Court found no error in the Single Judge's order and dismissed the appeal, directing the appellant to pay the additional pension from 1.5.2015.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pension - Additional Pension - Entitlement - Government Order dated 13.10.2010 - The respondent, a retired Assistant Engineer, sought additional pension under a Government Order that increased pension for government servants who retired on or after 1.7.1993 and attained age 80 and above. The appellant rejected his claim on the ground that he was ineligible until he attained 80 years. The Single Judge allowed the writ petition holding that the issue was covered by an earlier order. The Division Bench upheld the Single Judge's order, holding that the additional pension is payable from the date the respondent attained 80 years, i.e., 1.5.2015, and not from the date of the Government Order. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent is entitled to additional pension from the date he attained the age of 80 years or from the date of the Government Order dated 13.10.2010?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The order of the Single Judge dated 27.04.2015 in W.P.No.111122/2014 is upheld. The respondent is entitled to additional pension from 1.5.2015, the date he attained 80 years.

Law Points

  • Pensionary benefits
  • Additional pension
  • Government Order interpretation
  • Date of entitlement
  • Retrospective application
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (12) 42

Writ Appeal No.100481/2015 (S-RES)

2015-12-16

S. Abdul Nazeer, P.S. Dinesh Kumar

Smt. Shashikala L. Desai for appellants, Sri Rajashekhar R Gunjalli for respondent

The Commissioner, Hubballi-Dharwad Municipal Corporation, Hubballi and The Account Officer, Chief Account Office, Hubballi-Dharwad Municipal Corporation, Hubballi

S.V. Budapanahalli

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeal against order of Single Judge allowing writ petition for additional pension

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the order of Single Judge dated 27.04.2015 in W.P.No.111122/2014

Filing Reason

Appellants challenged the Single Judge's order granting additional pension to respondent from date of attaining 80 years

Previous Decisions

Single Judge allowed writ petition on 27.04.2015 in W.P.No.111122/2014, holding issue covered by order dated 3.9.2014 in W.P.No.105189/2014

Issues

Whether the respondent is entitled to additional pension from the date he attained the age of 80 years or from the date of the Government Order dated 13.10.2010?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that respondent was ineligible for 20% additional pension until he attained the age of 80 Respondent contended that he was entitled to additional pension from the date of Government Order

Ratio Decidendi

Additional pension under the Government Order dated 13.10.2010 is payable from the date the employee attains the age of 80 years, not from the date of the Government Order.

Judgment Excerpts

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials on record. The respondent attained the age of 80 on 1.5.2015. Therefore, he is entitled to additional pension from that date.

Procedural History

State Government passed order on 13.10.2010 increasing pension for retired government servants aged 80 and above. Respondent applied on 10.10.2014 for benefit, rejected by appellant on 28.10.2014. Respondent filed W.P.No.111122/2014, which was allowed by Single Judge on 27.04.2015. Appellants filed this writ appeal on 16.12.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: Section 4
  • Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977: Rule 27
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Section 35(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Meeting Convened Without Required Notice Period.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal by Complainant Society in Cheque Dishonour Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Limitation Error and Failure to Rebut Presumption. The court held that the complaint was within limitation and the accused did no...