Search Results for "section 260-A"

281 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 281 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows MRF Ltd. Appeal on Fringe Benefit Tax for Medical Reimbursement. Medical Reimbursement up to Rs.15,000 per Employee per Annum Not Chargeable to Fringe Benefit Tax Under Section 115WB(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, MRF Ltd., a company manufacturing automobile tyres and rubber products, filed Tax Case Appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Form-3 Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 for Assessment Year 2002-2003. Petitioner Bank's Appeal Pending Before High Court Constitutes 'Appeal Pending' Under Section 2(1)(a) of DTVSV Act, Entitling It to Scheme Benefits.

The Petitioner, Cooperative Rabobank U.A., a bank established in the Netherlands and part of the Rabobank Group, is a regular assessee under the Incom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Block Assessment Case — Upholds Tribunal's Deletion of Additions. No substantial question of law arose as the Tribunal's findings of fact were based on appreciation of evidence under Section 158BC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, dated 05 Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Dispute for Failure to Frame Substantial Question of Law. High Court's Dismissal Set Aside as It Did Not Decide Applicability of Section 35D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to a Bank Claiming Status as Industrial Undertaking.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-8 against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 01.08.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Marhatta Chamber of Commerce Held Eligible for Section 11 Exemption Despite Business Income. Trust's incidental business activity does not forfeit exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Tribunal's Deletion of Section 41(1) Addition Upheld. Remission of Transport Liability Not Taxable as Assessee Failed to Prove Cessation of Liability.

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Panaji Benc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tribunal Order for Ignoring Binding Precedent in Section 14A Disallowance Case. Tribunal's refusal to follow earlier decision of the same court on identical issue held to be a jurisdictional error warranting interference under Article 226.

The petitioner, HDFC Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 23 September ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case for Lack of Proper Inquiry. Commissioner's order under Section 263 set aside as no inquiry was conducted before passing the revision order.

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had set asid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...